Court of Justice of the 
European Communities
L-2925 Luxembourg
INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 
PROTOCOL 2 ANNEXED TO THE 
LUGANO CONVENTION
Nº 1992/3

Library, Research
and Documentation
  

Recent case-law relating to the Brussels 
and Lugano Conventions on Jurisdiction 
and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil 
and Commercial matters
  

Brussels 
Convention

Art. 5(3)
Art. 16(5)
Art. 24 
Court  :  Court of Justice of the European Communities
Date  :  26.03.1992
Number  :  C-261/90
Parties  :  Reichert and Kockler v Dresdner Bank AG
Publication  :  1992 p.I-02149
Notes  :  Borrás Rodríguez, Alegría: Revista Jurídica de Catalunya 1992 p.1124-1125
 
Keywords  :  Preliminary ruling
 
E-05.03 Brussels Convention - Special jurisdiction - Jurisdiction ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi delict’ - Concept - ‘Action paulienne’ - Not included
 
E-16.05 Brussels Convention - Exclusive jurisdiction - ‘Proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments’ - Concept - Disputes regarding the action of authorities responsible for enforcement - ‘Action paulienne’ - Not included
 
E-24 Brussels Convention - Jurisdiction to adopt provisional or protective measures - Measures seeking to maintain a factual or legal situation pending a decision on the substance of the matter - ‘Action paulienne’ - Not included
 
Annexes  : 

Summary of the judgment in French and in English (PDF)
Summary of the judgment in French and in English (HTML)
Judgment in the language of the case (French) (PDF)
Judgment in the language of the case (French) and in English (HTML)
Opinion of the Advocate General in the original language (Danish) and in French (PDF)
 Opinion of the Advocate General in the original language (Danish), in French and in English (HTML)  
 

Observations  : 

See also judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 January 1990, C-115/88, Reichert and Kockler v Dresdner Bank AG, [1990] ECR I-00027, concerning article 16, point 1, Brussels Convention

BACK HOME