PRESS RELEASE No 42/03
20 May 2003
Judgments of the Court of Justice in Cases C-469/00 and C-108/01
Ravil SARL v Bellon Import SARL and Biraghi SpA; Consorzio del Prosciutto di
Parma and Salumificio S. Rita SpA v Asda Stores Ltd and Hygrade Foods
Ltd
THE COURT CONFIRMS THE EXTENT OF PROTECTION CONFERRED BY COMMUNITY LEGISLATION ON GRANA
PADANO CHEESE AND PARMA HAM
Maintaining the quality and reputation of Grana Padano cheese and Parma ham justifies
the rule that the product must be grated or sliced and packaged in
the region of production
In 1996 the Commission adopted a regulation on the registration of geographical indications
and PDOs. It registers, among others, the Italian cheese Grana Padano and the
Italian ham Prosciutto di Parma. The specification for the PDO Grana Padano expressly
refers to Italian law under which the cheese has to be grated and
packaged in the region of production. The specification for the PDO Prosciutto di
Parma expressly requires the ham to be sliced and packaged in the region
of production, also referring to Italian law on this point.
- The French company Ravil imports, grates, pre-packages and distributes in France, among other
products, Grana Padano cheese, which it markets under the name "Grana Padano râpé
frais" (Grana Padano freshly grated). The Italian company Biraghi, a producer of Grana
Padano cheese in Italy, and the French company Bellon, the exclusive importer and
distributor of Biraghi products in France, sought for Ravil to cease distribution, arguing
before the French courts that Italian law makes the use of the Grana
Padano name subject to the condition that the grating and packaging are done
in the region of production. The Cour de Cassation referred to the Court
of Justice for a preliminary ruling a question on the compatibility of the
Italian legislation with Community law (Case C-469/00).
- The Asda supermarkets, in the United Kingdom, sell ham under the designation "Parma
ham"; Asda buys it from Hygrade, which in turn buys the ham boned
but not sliced from an Italian producer belonging to the association Consorzio del
Prosciutto di Parma. Hygrade slices the ham and packs it hermetically in the
United Kingdom. The Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma brought proceedings in the United
Kingdom against Asda and Hygrade, seeking for them to cease their activities, on
the ground that they were contrary to the rules applicable to Parma ham.
The House of Lords referred to the Court of Justice for a preliminary
ruling a question on the interpretation of the Community regulations on the PDO
(Case C-108/01).
The Court of Justice points out, first, that the specification determines the extent
of the uniform protection which the 1992 regulation confers within the Community. That
regulation does not exclude the determination of special technical rules applicable to operations
leading to different presentations on the market of the same product, in order
to satisfy the criteria of quality and guarantee an identifiable geographical origin.
Consequently, grating, slicing and packaging the product may be made conditional on those
operations taking place in the region of production, where the corresponding conditions are
laid down in the specification.
But the Court of Justice also finds that such conditions restrict patterns of
exports of cheese bearing the PDO Grana Padano and ham bearing the PDO
Parma ham. Only Grana Padano cheese grated and packaged in the region of
production and Parma ham sliced and packaged in the region of production retain
the right to use the PDOs. Those conditions therefore constitute measures equivalent to
a quantitative restriction, which are prohibited by the principle of the free movement
of goods laid down in the EC Treaty.
Can they be justified?
The Court recalls that the EC Treaty provides for exceptions to the free
movement of goods on grounds such as the protection of industrial and commercial
property.
It notes that Community legislation displays a general tendency to enhance the quality
of products within the framework of the common agricultural policy, in order to
promote the reputation of those products, in particular through the use of PDOs.
Those PDOs constitute industrial and commercial property rights which protect those entitled to
use them against improper use of those designations by third parties seeking to
profit from the reputation which they have acquired. They are thus intended to
guarantee that the product in question comes from a specified geographical area and
displays certain particular characteristics which are valued by consumers.
The conditions laid down by the specifications for Grana Padano cheese and Parma
ham are therefore consistent with Community law, provided that they are necessary and
proportionate for the purposes of protecting the PDOs Grana Padano and Parma ham.
The Court points out that the grating of cheese and slicing of ham
and their packaging constitute important operations which may damage the quality and authenticity
and consequently the reputation of the PDO if those requirements are not complied
with. The specifications for Grana Padano cheese and Parma ham define checks and
detailed strict operations in order to preserve the reputation of those two products.
The PDOs of those products would not be protected in the same way
by an obligation imposed on operators outside the region of production to inform
consumers by appropriate labelling that grating, slicing and packaging have taken place outside
that region. There are therefore no alternative, less restrictive measures to attain the
objective pursued.
However, the Court finds that the protection conferred by a PDO does not
normally extend to operations such as grating, slicing and packaging the product. The
Court states that those operations are prohibited to third parties outside the region
of production only if that is expressly laid down in the specification. The
principle of legal certainty requires that adequate publicity be given to those prohibitions
- for example being mentioned
- to bring them to the attention of
third parties. In the absence of such publicity, those prohibitions cannot be relied
on before a national court.
Available in all the official languages For the full text of the judgments, please consult our Internet page www.curia.eu.int at about 3 pm today For further information please contact Christopher Fretwell: Tel: (352) 4303 3355; Fax: (352) 4303 2731 Pictures of the hearing are available on "Europe by Satellite" ) European Commission, Press and Communication, L-2920 Luxembourg, Tel (352) 4301 35177, Fax (352) 4301 35249, or B-1049 Brussels, Tel (32) 2 2964106, Fax (32) 2 2965956 or (32) 2 2301280 |