Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 June 2018 — Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO
(Case C‑118/18 P)
(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark bittorrent — Declaration of revocation)
1. Appeal — Grounds — Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded — Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure
(Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181)
(see paras 5, 6)
2. EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Assessment of the registrability of a sign — EU rules only taken into account — Decisions of national authorities not binding EU bodies
(Council Regulation No 207/2009)
(see paras 5, 6)
3. Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility
(Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
(see paras 5, 6)
Operative part
1. | | The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
2. | | Hochmann Marketing GmbH shall bear its own costs. |