Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 September 2019 — Hesse v EUIPO

(Case C‑426/19 P)

(Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

Appeal — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)

(see paras 11-14)

Operative part

1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed.

2. Mr Kurt Hesse is ordered to bear his own costs.