Language of document :

Action brought on 22 July 2014 — ZZ v European External Action Service (EEAS)

(Case F-71/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L.F. de Castro and J.-L. Gillain, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision no longer to pay the allowance for living conditions (ALC), the additional payment (AP) based on the living conditions in the applicant’s place of employment and a daily allowance (DA), and to pay for 49 days’ leave not taken in respect of 2012 and a claim for compensation for the harm caused by a failure to offer aid or assistance and abandonment following the work-place accident suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

Payment of the AP and ALC from 1 May 2012 to 31 October 2013, or, at the very least, payment thereof for the same period as that of the DA;

Payment for the 49 days’ leave not taken during 2012;

Re-establishment of the contract or the establishment of a new contract for an indefinite period or which must, at term, be confirmed as a contract for an indefinite period or compensation for the harm connected with the fact that, absent the accident, a new contract would have been concluded between the applicant and the defendant;

Compensation for the loss which she suffered following the accident. (i) EUR 10 000 as regards the failure to offer aid and assistance in Jordan and in Brussels on a medical, administrative and financial level; (ii) a sum equal to all the salary, allowances and benefits not paid and lost and costs incurred, medical and other, by the applicant because of the accident, provisionally estimated at EUR 50 000, in respect of the accident for which liability lies with the United Nations and the EEAS; the latter must assist and finance the action for a declaration of liability of the United Nations and all parties involved in the organisation of that period of probation. (iii) a provisional sum of EUR 50 000 in respect of the misuse of fixed-term contracts, each containing a probation clause, in particular the latter and the failure to renew it.