Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 — Trapeza Peiraios
(Case C‑105/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Powers and obligations of the national court — Order for payment procedure — Granting of the application to have that order set aside — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
1. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits — General or hypothetical questions — Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU)
(see paras 9, 10)
2. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Need to provide the Court with sufficient information on the factual and legislative context — Statement of the reasons for requiring an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, art. 94)
(see paras 11-15)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron (Court of First Instance (single judge), Serres, Greece), by decision of 11 January 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.