ORDER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
(Second Chamber)

16 July 2015

Case F‑79/13 OP

Valéria Anna Gyarmathy

v

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)

(Civil service — Judgment by default — Application to set aside made by the applicant — Manifest inadmissibility)

Application:      application to set aside made on the basis of Article 124 of the Rules of Procedure (which reproduces — with amendments — Article 116(4) to (6) of the Rules of Procedure in force until 30 September 2014), by which Ms Gyarmathy seeks to challenge the judgment of the Tribunal of 18 May 2015 in Gyarmathy v EMCDDA (F‑79/13, EU:F:2015:49) given by default against the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).

Held:      The application to set aside made by Ms Gyarmathy is manifestly inadmissible. Ms Gyarmathy is to bear her own costs.

Summary

Judicial proceedings — Action before the Civil Service Tribunal — Application to set aside made by the applicant against a judgment given by default — Inadmissibility

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 41; Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal, Arts 121 and 124)

Pursuant to Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice and Articles 121 and 124 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal, a judgment can be given by default only against a defendant and only if that party has failed to file written submissions in defence within the prescribed time-limit. Furthermore, only the defendant is entitled to make an application to set aside that judgment.

(see para. 12)