Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2008 - Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni and trekking.at Reisen GmbH
(Case C-278/08)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Die BergSpechte Outdoor Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH
Defendants: Günter Guni and trekking.at Reisen GmbH
Questions referred
Must Article 5(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks ('Directive 89/104')
1 be interpreted as meaning that a trade mark is used in a manner reserved for the proprietor of the trade mark if the trade mark or a sign similar to it (such as the word component of a word and figurative trade mark) is reserved as a keyword with a search engine operator and advertising for identical or similar goods or services therefore appears on the screen when the trade mark or the sign similar to it is entered as a search term?
If the answer to Question 1 is yes:
(A) Is the trade mark proprietor's exclusive right infringed by the utilisation of a search term identical with the trade mark for an advertisement for identical goods or services, regardless of whether the accessed advertisement appears in the list of hits or in a separate advertising block and whether it is marked as a 'sponsored link'?
(B) In respect of the utilisation of a sign identical with the trade mark for similar goods or services, or the utilisation of a sign similar to the trade mark for identical or similar goods or services, is the fact that the advertisement is marked as a 'sponsored link' and/or appears not in the list of hits but in a separate advertising block sufficient to exclude any likelihood of confusion?
____________1 - OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1.