Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2014 — Zoo Sport v OHIM
(Case C‑675/13 P)
Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative trade mark zoo sport in black and white — Opposition by the proprietor of Community figurative and word marks containing the word elements ‘ZOOT’ and ‘SPORTS ZOOT SPORTS’ — Refusal in part of registration
1. Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see para. 17)
2. Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 21, 22)
Operative part
1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |
2. | | Zoo Sport Ltd is ordered to pay the costs. |