Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 March 2019 — Sevenfriday v EUIPO
(Case C‑734/18 P)
(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Application for registration of the word mark SEVENFRIDAY — Opposition proceedings — Rejection of the application for registration — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
1. Appeal — Grounds — Lack of specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning and of legal arguments in support of the appeal — Inadmissibility
(Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))
(see para. 5)
2. Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Inadmissibility — Challenge to the interpretation or application of EU law made by the General Court — Admissibility
(Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d))
(see para. 5)
3. Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility
(Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1))
(see para. 5)
4. Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted
(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
(see para. 5)
Operative part
1. | | The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
2. | | Sevenfriday AG is ordered to bear its own costs. |