Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2019 — Wilo Salmson France

(Case C‑10/19)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility

(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94)

(see paras 12-25)

Operative part

The request for a preliminary ruling made by Tribunalul Bucureşti (Regional Court, Bucharest, Romania), by decision of 2 February 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.