Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2019 — Armostav Místek
(Case C‑520/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the factual and legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 53(2) and 94)
(see paras 14-22, operative part)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě (Regional Court, Ostrava, Czech Republic), made by decision of 18 June 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.