Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 16 September 2019 — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik v Prim

(Case C‑421/19 P)

(Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed)

1.      Judicial proceedings — Admissibility of actions — Judged by reference to the situation when the application was lodged — Entry into force of the procedure for determining whether appeals should be allowed to proceed during the period within which an appeal must be lodged — Applicability to an appeal lodged after the entry into force

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a)

(see paras 8-10)

2.      Appeal — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant — Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170)

(see paras 12-15)

Operative part

1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed.

2. Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH shall bear its own costs.