Language of document :

Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB

(Case T-414/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)

Defendant: Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the court should:

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05)’), and in any event to the extent that that decision concerns the applicant; and

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of incomplete notification of the decision

Second plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the decision

____________