Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2020 — Boé Aquitaine

(Case C‑838/19)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Need to provide the Court with sufficient information on the factual and legislative context — Extent of the obligation in the sphere of competition — Insufficient information regarding that context —  Lack of indications on the applicability to an internal situation of a provision of EU law rendered applicable by national law — Manifest inadmissibility

(Art. 267 TFEU; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 53(2) and 94)

(see paras 13-27)

Operative part

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal de commerce de Bordeaux (France), by decision of 22 March 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.