Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : paragraph 29
• Directive 2011/95 : paragraph 35
• Directive 2011/95 -A20P1 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2011/95 -A20P2 : paragraphs 7, 33
• Directive 2011/95 -A29 : paragraphs 1, 8, 21, 41, 50, 56, 57, 59
• Directive 2011/95 -A29P1 : paragraphs 48, 51
• Directive 2011/95 -A29P2 : paragraph 49
• Directive 2011/95 -A32 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2011/95 -A32P2 : paragraphs 38, 39
• Directive 2011/95 -A33 : paragraphs 1, 10, 21 - 26, 34, 36, 37, 40 - 43, 45, 56, 57, 60, 61, 64
• Directive 2011/95 -C16 : paragraphs 6, 29
• Directive 2011/95 -C23 : paragraphs 6, 28
• Directive 2011/95 -C24 : paragraphs 6, 28
• Directive 2011/95 -C3 : paragraphs 6, 30
• Directive 2011/95 -C33 : paragraphs 6, 31
• Directive 2011/95 -C39 : paragraphs 6, 32
• Directive 2011/95 -C4 : paragraphs 6, 28
• Directive 2011/95 -C6 : paragraphs 6, 31
• Directive 2011/95 -C8 : paragraphs 6, 32
• Directive 2011/95 -C9 : paragraphs 6, 32
• Directive 2011/95 -CH7 : paragraphs 7, 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -364/11 -N42 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -364/11 -N43 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -285/12 -N33 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N31 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/13 -N27 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -443/14 -N34 : paragraph 25

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2011/95 -A29
• Interprets : Directive 2011/95 -A33

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 20 : point 71
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 : points 75, 77, 105, 106
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 -P1 : point 71
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 34 : point 45
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 45 : point 46
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 45 -P1 : point 34
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 45 -P2 : point 34
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : point 81
  
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : point 34
  
• TFEU, Article 26 -P2 : point 36
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P1 : point 36
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P3LB : point 34
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P3LC : point 34
  
• TFEU, Article 46 : point 36
  
• TFEU, Article 48 : point 36
  
• TFEU, Article 78 : point 93
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : points 8, 41
  
• TFEU, Article 79 -P2LB : point 34
  
• TFEU, Article 202 : point 35
  
• TEU, Article 3 -P2 : point 36
  
• TEU, Article 6 -P3 : point 46
  
• Directive 2003/9 : points 49, 50, 52
  
• Directive 2003/9 -A07 : point 51
  
• Directive 2003/109 : points 45, 80
  
• Directive 2003/109 -A11P1LH : point 37
  
• Directive 2004/38 : point 34
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A22 : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/83 : points 49, 50, 52, 89
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A32 : points 43, 49, 50
  
• Directive 2009/50 -A14P1LH : point 37
  
• Directive 2011/51 : point 45
  
• Directive 2011/95 : points 42, 49, 88, 89, 92, 93
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A02LB : point 10
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A02LE : point 89
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A02LF : point 10
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A02LG : point 10
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A20P1 : points 42, 89
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A20P2 : point 90
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A24 : point 79
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A29 : points 1, 12, 22, 58, 59, 65 - 67, 94
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A32 : point 13
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A32P2 : points 48, 66
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A33 : points 1, 14, 22, 24, 26, 33, 37, 47, 49, 50, 52 - 54, 58, 65 - 68, 74, 94, 95, 101, 104 - 106
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C16 : points 9, 71
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C17 : point 9
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C23 : point 41
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C24 : point 41
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C33 : point 9
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C39 : point 9
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C4 : points 9, 41
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C41 : points 70, 83
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C45 : point 9
  
• Directive 2011/95 -CH7 : points 71, 89 - 93
  
• Directive 2013/32 : point 92
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A07 : point 51
  
• Directive 2014/36 -A22LB : point 37
  
• Directive 2014/66 -A17LB : point 37
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52001PC0181 : point 50
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52001PC0510 : points 49, 50
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -36/75 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -36/75 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/01 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/07 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/07 -N55 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/08 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/08 -N78 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -57/09 -N42 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -31/09 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -70/10 -N88 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -571/10 -N79 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/11 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/11 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -364/11 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -604/12 -N46 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/12 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/12 -N39 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -285/12 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/12 -N43 : points 71, 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N28 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N32 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N34 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -542/13 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -562/13 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/13 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/13 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -481/13 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -481/13 -N24 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -481/13 -N26 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/13 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -562/13 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -445/14 : point 23
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 25/09/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 06/10/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

01/03/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 156 from 02.05.2016, p.10

Application: OJ C 439 from 08.12.2014, p.21

Name of the parties

Alo

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Pelzer, Marei: Wohnsitzauflage gegenüber subsidiär Schutzberechtigten, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 2016 p.448-449 (DE)
2. Slot, P.J.: Ars aequi 2016 p.460-461 (NL)
3. Jégo, Vanessa: Arrêt " Alo et Osso " : les États membres peuvent-ils imposer une obligation de résidence aux bénéficiaires de la protection subsidiaire?, Journal de droit européen 2016 nº 229 p.182-184 (FR)
4. Pahladsingh, A.: Integratie kan woonplaatsplicht bij personen met subsidiaire bescherming rechtvaardigen, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2016 p.121-127 (NL)
5. Gunn, Ella: Case Comment: Kreis Warendorf v Alo and Osso v Region Hannover, Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law 2016 p.178-181 (EN)
6. Marotti, Loris: Sul diritto di scegliere la residenza per i beneficiari dello status di protezione sussidiaria : profili evolutivi e aspetti problematici nell'approccio della Corte di giustizia, Diritti umani e diritto internazionale 2016 p.481-488 (IT)
7. Colavitti, Romélien: Obligation de résidence des bénéficiaires de la protection subsidiaire, Revue des affaires européennes 2016 p.139-147 (FR)
8. Zabel, Matthias: Zulässigkeit ausländerrechtlicher Wohnsitzauflagen, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2016 p.1057-1059 (DE)
9. Gazin, Fabienne: Droit à la libre circulation et à l'assistance sociale des bénéficiaires de la protection subsidiaire, Europe 2016 Mai Comm. nº 5 p.14-16 (FR)
10. Lehner, Roman ; Lippold, Andreas: Wohnsitzauflagen für anerkannte Flüchtlinge und subsidiär Schutzberechtigte: Was lässt das (Europa-) Recht zu?, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2016 p.81-89 (DE)
11. Lehofer, Hans Peter: Wohnsitzauflagen für Personen mit subsidiärem Schutzstatus nur unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen zulässig, Österreichische Juristenzeitung 2016 p.474-475 (DE)
12. Peyrl, Johannes: Zum Wohnsitzerfordernis für Personen, die internationalen Schutz genießen, Das Recht der Arbeit 2016 p.329-331 (DE)
13. Archontaki, Aspasia: Scholiasmos tis apofasis C-443/14 kai 444/14, Efarmoges dimosiou dikaiou 2016 p.314-316 (EL)
14. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Choice of residence for refugees and subsidiary protection beneficiaries; variations on the equality principle: Alo and Osso, Common Market Law Review 2017 p.631-644 (EN)
15. Zagorc, Saša ; Stare, Katja: Subsidiarna zaščita v evropskem in mednarodnem azilnem sistemu - nadgradnja ali spodkopavanje sistema ?, Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav 2018 p.75-99 (EN, SL)
16. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº 3 p.114-130 (FR)
17. Zagorc, Saša ; Stare, Katja: Subsidiarna zaščita v evropskem in mednarodnem azilnem sistemu — nadgradnja ali spodkopavanje sistema?, Zbornik Znanstvenih Razprav 2019 n°LXXVIII p.75-99 (SL)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesverwaltungsgericht - Germany

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - asylum policy
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Aufenthaltsgesetz (AufenthG), Paragraph 12 Abs. 2 und Paragraph 25 Abs. 2

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention de Genève relative au statut des réfugiés (28/07/1951), art. 23 et 26

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bay Larsen

Advocate General

Cruz Villalón

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Spanish