CURIA - Case information

Home > Search form > List of results > Case information

Start printing

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 November 2018

C and A v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Directive 2003/86/EC — Right to family reunification — Article 15 — Refusal to grant an autonomous residence permit — National legislation providing for a requirement to pass a civic integration examination

Case C-257/17

Documents in the Case

Document

Date

Name of the parties

Subject-matter

Curia

EUR-Lex

Autres Liens

Judgment (OJ)

14/12/2018

C and A

area of freedom, security and justice
- Immigration policy

Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:876

07/11/2018

C and A

area of freedom, security and justice
- Immigration policy

Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:876

07/11/2018

C and A

area of freedom, security and justice
- Immigration policy

Application (OJ)

28/07/2017

C and A

area of freedom, security and justice
- Immigration policy

Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2018:503

27/06/2018

C and A

area of freedom, security and justice
- Immigration policy

Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice

4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.04 Immigration policy

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 28, 34, 44
Directive 2003/86 : paragraphs 30, 50
Directive 2003/86 -A02LC : paragraphs 4, 29, 40
Directive 2003/86 -A03P3 : paragraphs 5, 23, 27, 29, 36, 40
Directive 2003/86 -A05P2 : paragraph 58
Directive 2003/86 -A07P2 : paragraphs 6, 56, 57
Directive 2003/86 -A15 : paragraphs 7, 24 - 26, 28, 34, 44, 57, 67
Directive 2003/86 -A15P1 : paragraphs 1, 27, 45, 46, 51, 52, 59, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71
Directive 2003/86 -A15P4 : paragraphs 1, 27, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 65, 66, 69, 71
Directive 2003/86 -C15 : paragraphs 3, 51, 55
Directive 2003/109 : paragraph 58
Directive 2003/109 -A05P2 : paragraph 8
Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N37 : paragraph 38
Court of Justice - Judgment C -28/95 -N33 : paragraph 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -540/03 -N69 : paragraph 55
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N17 : paragraph 31
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N19 : paragraph 33
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 : paragraphs 25, 27, 41
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N36 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N37 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N38 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N39 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N40 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N41 : paragraph 42
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N45 : paragraph 31
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N46 : paragraph 32
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N47 : paragraph 33
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N51 : paragraph 43
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N52 : paragraph 43
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11 -N48 : paragraph 30
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11 -N49 : paragraph 30
Court of Justice - Judgment C -313/12 -N33 : paragraph 33
Court of Justice - Judgment C -579/13 -N48 : paragraph 61
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N46 : paragraph 50
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N50 : paragraph 51
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N51 : paragraph 60
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N53 : paragraphs 55, 61
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N54 : paragraphs 61, 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N55 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N56 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N57 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N58 : paragraphs 63, 64
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N59 : paragraphs 52, 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N60 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N61 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N62 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N63 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N64 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N65 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N66 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N67 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N68 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N69 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 -N70 : paragraph 63
Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/15 -N53 : paragraph 31
Court of Justice - Judgment C -685/15 -N45 : paragraph 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/16 -N29 : paragraph 37
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/16 -N30 : paragraph 37
Court of Justice - Judgment C -327/16 -N34 : paragraph 32
Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/16 -N42 : paragraph 49
Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/17 -N28 : paragraph 37

Operative part

Interprets : TFEU, Article 267
Interprets : Directive 2003/86 -A15
Interprets : Directive 2003/86 -A15P1
Interprets : Directive 2003/86 -A15P4

Opinion

TFEU, Article 267 : point 34
Directive 2003/86 : points 1, 33, 55, 56, 59, 60, 63, 73, 75
Directive 2003/86 -A01 : point 8
Directive 2003/86 -A02LD : point 9
Directive 2003/86 -A03P3 : points 10, 25, 28, 32
Directive 2003/86 -A06 : point 60
Directive 2003/86 -A07 : points 3, 60
Directive 2003/86 -A07P1 : point 52
Directive 2003/86 -A07P2 : points 11, 47, 51 - 53, 64, 66, 70
Directive 2003/86 -A07P2L1 : point 67
Directive 2003/86 -A08 : point 60
Directive 2003/86 -A12P1 : point 60
Directive 2003/86 -A15 : points 13, 27, 40, 41, 50, 54, 61, 62, 72
Directive 2003/86 -A15P1 : points 12, 24, 28, 45, 60, 63, 65, 76, 78, 79, 81 - 85
Directive 2003/86 -A15P3 : points 12, 63, 83
Directive 2003/86 -A15P4 : points 3, 12, 26, 28, 45, 46, 48, 49, 51, 53, 57, 60, 63 - 66, 68, 76, 78, 79, 81, 84, 85
Directive 2003/86 -A17 : point 74
Directive 2003/86 -C2 : point 4
Directive 2003/86 -C4 : point 5
Directive 2003/86 -C6 : points 6, 60
Directive 2003/86 -C15 : points 7, 62
Directive 2003/109 -A05P2 : points 51, 53
Directive 2004/38 : point 33
Directive 2006/112 : point 38
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51999PC0638 : point 62
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51999PC0638 -A01 : point 32
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51999PC0638 -A03P1LC : point 32
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52000PC0624 : point 32
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52002PC0225 : points 32, 63
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52005DC0389 : point 47
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52008DC0610 : points 33, 72
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52014DC0210 : point 47
Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N33 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N35 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/93 -N16 : point 36
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/04 -N15 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -578/08 -N43 : point 55
Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/09 -N24 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/10 -N24 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/10 -N25 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/10 -N26 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N15 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N16 : point 34
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N17 : point 36
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N19 : point 36
Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/10 -N75 : point 67
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11 -N74 : point 55
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11 -N81 : point 75
Court of Justice - Judgment C -313/12 -N22 : point 25
Court of Justice - Opinion C -138/13 -N52 : point 52
Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/13 -N17 : point 82
Court of Justice - Judgment C -579/13 : point 26
Court of Justice - Judgment C -153/14 : point 24
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N61 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N62 : point 25
Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/15 : point 25
Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N27 : point 36
Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N29 : point 36
Court of Justice - Opinion C -303/16 -N33 : point 36
Court of Justice - Opinion C -303/16 -N49 : point 38
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/16 : point 38
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/16 -N25 : point 36
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/16 -N27 : point 36
Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/16 -N60 : point 82

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

15/05/2017

Date of the Opinion

27/06/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

07/11/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 16 from 14.01.2019, p.12

Application: OJ C 269 from 14.08.2017, p.2

Name of the parties

C and A

Notes on Academic Writings

Klaasen, M.A.K. ; Verbaten, H.: Lidstaten mogen voor verkrijging van een autonoom verblijfsrecht in het kader van de Gezinsherenigingsrichtlijn verlangen dat een vreemdeling slaagt voor een inburgeringsexamen, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2019 nº 58-70 p.381-385 (NL)
Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº 3 p.114-130 (FR)
Michel, Valérie: Test d'intégration civique, Europe 2019 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.23-24 (FR)
Oosterom-Staples, H.: Integratie in het EU-migratierecht; uniformiteit of maatwerk, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2019 p.61-70 (NL)
Oosterom-Staples, H.: Integratie in het EU-migratierecht; uniformiteit of maatwerk ?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2019 N°3/4 p.61-70 (NL)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Raad van State - Netherlands

Subject-matter

area of freedom, security and justice
- Immigration policy
Justice and home affairs

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bay Larsen

Advocate General

Mengozzi

Language(s) of the Case

Dutch

Language(s) of the Opinion

French