Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
|
|
2.06.02 Own resources of the European Union
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.06 Financial provisions
2.06.02 Own resources of the European Union
|
|
|
2.06.02 Own resources of the European Union
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.06 Financial provisions
2.06.02 Own resources of the European Union
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EU Treaty (Maastricht), Article K.3
: paragraph 4
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49
: paragraphs 54, 55, 57
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A23 : paragraph 31
-
TFEU, Article 101
: paragraphs 25, 27, 59, 60, 65
-
TFEU, Article 107
: paragraphs 25, 27, 59, 61, 62, 65
-
TFEU, Article 107
-P1 : paragraph 61
-
TFEU, Article 119
: paragraphs 25, 27, 63 - 65
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraph 29
-
TFEU, Article 325
: paragraphs 3, 37, 39
-
TFEU, Article 325
-P1 : paragraphs 47, 51, 52, 58
-
TFEU, Article 325
-P2 : paragraphs 48, 51, 52, 58
-
TEU, Article 4
-P3 : paragraphs 36, 47, 60
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
: paragraph 4
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A01 : paragraph 41
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A01P1 : paragraph 5
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A02P1 : paragraphs 6, 40, 47
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-C5 : paragraph 4
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-C6 : paragraph 4
-
Directive 2006/112
: paragraphs 7 - 9, 27, 35, 36, 39, 47
-
Directive 2006/112
-A131 : paragraph 7
-
Directive 2006/112
-A138P1 : paragraph 8
-
Directive 2006/112
-A158 : paragraphs 9, 27, 34, 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A158P2 : paragraph 25
-
Decision 2007/436
: paragraph 10
-
Decision 2007/436
-A02P1 : paragraph 10
-
Decision 2007/436
-A02P1LB : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N72 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -457/02
-N30 : paragraph 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
-N51 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -606/10
-N73 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N25 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N26 : paragraphs 37, 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N34 : paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -528/11
-N29 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12
-N18 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13
-N34 : paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -105/14
-N45 : paragraph 31
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Maastricht)
: point 37
-
EU Treaty (Maastricht), Article K.3
-P2LC : points 11, 39, 96
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-P2 : points 124, 127
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49
: point 113
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49
-P1 : point 115
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P3 : point 113
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A23 : point 45
-
TFEU - Protocol No 12
: point 70
-
TFEU - Protocol No 36
-A09 : point 37
-
TFEU - Protocol No 36
-A10P1 : point 38
-
TFEU - Protocol No 36
-A10P3 : point 38
-
TFEU, Article 101
: points 6, 32, 50, 55, 58 - 60
-
TFEU, Article 107
: points 6, 32, 50, 55, 58 - 61
-
TFEU, Article 119
: points 6, 32, 50, 55, 67 - 71
-
TFEU, Article 119
-P3 : points 69, 71
-
TFEU, Article 126
-P1 : point 70
-
TFEU, Article 126
-P2 : point 70
-
TFEU, Article 267
: points 35, 41, 98
-
TFEU, Article 275
-L1 : point 35
-
TFEU, Article 325
: points 5, 7, 83, 84, 117, 122, 128
-
TEU, Article 4
-P3 : points 5, 60, 80, 82, 84, 117, 122, 128
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : point 97
-
TEU, Article 19
-P3LB : point 97
-
TEU, Article 24
-P1L2 : point 35
-
TEU, Article 35
-P2 : point 39
-
TEU, Article 35
-P3LB : point 39
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
: points 5, 11 - 13, 37, 39, 94 - 103, 117, 122
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A01 : point 12
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A01P1 : point 94
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A02 : point 105
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A02P1 : points 93, 104, 128
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-A02P1LB : points 83, 100
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-C1 : point 101
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31995F1127(03)
-C2 : point 101
-
Regulation 2988/95
: points 5, 8, 84, 117, 122, 128
-
Regulation 2988/95
-A01P2 : point 8
-
Regulation 2988/95
-A03 : points 9, 87
-
Regulation 2988/95
-A06 : points 84, 89
-
Regulation 2988/95
-A06P1 : point 10
-
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 31997F0520(01)
: point 39
-
Directive 2006/112
: points 5, 14 - 16, 62 - 64, 82, 84, 122, 128
-
Directive 2006/112
-A131 : point 14
-
Directive 2006/112
-A138 : point 65
-
Directive 2006/112
-A138P1 : point 15
-
Directive 2006/112
-A157P2 : point 16
-
Directive 2006/112
-A158 : points 16, 32, 55, 64
-
Directive 2006/112
-TIT9CH10 : point 16
-
Directive 2006/112
-TIT9CH4 : point 15
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A94 : point 41
-
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52001PC0272
: point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/77
-N21 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/77
-N24 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/80
-N9 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/83
-N28 : points 85, 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/84
-N71 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/84
-N72 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/85
-N10 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/86
-N20 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -80/86
-N13 : points 110, 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/86
-N11 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/86
-N7 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/86
-N8 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -186/87
-N19 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/88
-N23 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/88
-N24 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/88
-N20 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/89
-N8 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/89
-N8 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/89
-N18 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/93
-N61 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/95
-N23 : point 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/95
-N24 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/95
-N36 : point 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/95
-N79 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/97
-N22 : points 42, 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/98
-N22 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/99
-N25 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -162/00
-N49 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N113 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N115 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N116 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N117 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N118 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N119 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N107 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N108 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N110 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N155 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N156 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N157 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N31 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02
-N91 : point 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/02
-N30 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
: points 4, 48, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N18 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N19 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N20 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N21 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N22 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N64 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N65 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N68 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N69 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N73 : point 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02
-N74 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/03
-N29 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/03
-N42 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/03
-N45 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Order C -23/03
: point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/04
-N46 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/04
-N47 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/04
-N31 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04
-N102 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04
-N103 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04
-N104 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04
-N110 : point 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04
-N111 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04
-N94 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/04
-N68 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -437/04
-N56 : point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -208/05
-N68 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/05
-N49 : point 113
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/05
-N50 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N39 : point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N43 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N44 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N45 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N46 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N47 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/06
-N52 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06
-N42 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/06
-N28 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/06
-N29 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/06
-N30 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/06
-N31 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -303/06
-N32 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/06
-N70 : point 113
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/06
-N71 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -404/06
-N32 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/07
-N46 : points 42, 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
-N48 : point 107
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -358/08
-N50 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/08
-N94 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -484/08
-N46 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/09
-N72 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/09
-N73 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/09
-N30 : point 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/09
-N31 : point 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/09
-N41 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -539/09
-N71 : point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -539/09
-N72 : points 83, 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09
: point 51
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09
-N68 : point 107
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/10
-N43 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/10
-N24 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/10
-N27 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -416/10
-N53 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -416/10
-N54 : points 42, 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/10
-N41 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/10
-N42 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/10
-N43 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/10
-N44 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -500/10
-N22 : point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -500/10
-N28 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -610/10
-N45 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
: point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N25 : point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N26 : points 83, 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N27 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N28 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N34 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N36 : points 82, 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N45 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/11
-N33 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -657/11
-N28 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12
-N18 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -81/12
-N71 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12
-N38 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12
-N39 : point 110
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N16 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N17 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N18 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N19 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N20 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N21 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N22 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N23 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N24 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N25 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N26 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N27 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N28 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N29 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N30 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N31 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N32 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N33 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N34 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N35 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N36 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N37 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N38 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N39 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N40 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N41 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N42 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N43 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N44 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N45 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N46 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N47 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/13
-N48 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -596/13
-N28 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -596/13
-N29 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -596/13
-N30 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -596/13
-N31 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/13
-N52 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/13
-N28 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/13
-N29 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/13
-N61 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/13
-N62 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/13
-N64 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -562/13
-N37 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Order C -204/14
-N16 : point 75
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
08/09/2015
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 363 from 03.11.2015, p.11
Application: OJ C 194 from 24.06.2014, p.10
Name of the parties
Taricco and Others
Notes on Academic Writings
- Skubic, Zoran: Zastaranje davčnih goljufij po pravu EU - nedopustno?, Pravna praksa 2015 nº 38 p.23-24 (SL)
- Mobilio, Giuseppe: Dal caso Taricco al redde rationem tra Corte di Giustizia e Corte costituzionale, Quaderni costituzionali 2015 p.1009-1013 (IT)
- Takis, Athanasios: Armenopoulos 2015 p.1969-1971 (EL)
- Mosbrucker, Anne-Laure: Fraude à la TVA, Europe 2015 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.37 (FR)
- Rossi, Francesco: La sentenza Taricco della Corte di Giustizia e il problema degli obblighi di disapplicazione in malam partem della normativa penale interna per contrasto con il diritto UE, Diritto penale e processo : mensile di giurisprudenza, legislazione e dottrina 2015 p.1564-1571 (IT)
- Kollmann, Jasmin ; Spies, Karoline ; Turcan, Laura ; Turic, Draga: EuGH-Rechtsprechungsübersicht: Neues zur Umsatzsteuer, Ecolex 2015 p.1097-1101 (DE)
- Berger, Maria ; Maderbacher, Gregor: Zu kurze absolute Verjährungsfrist für Mehrwertsteuerbetrug kann unionsrechtswidrig sein und ist gegebenenfalls unangewendet zu lassen, Österreichische Juristenzeitung 2015 p.909 (DE)
- Mosbrucker, Anne-Laure: Fraude à la TVA, Europe 2015 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.37 (FR)
- Maffeo, Adriano: Le système italien de la prescription des poursuites pénales entre Charybde et Scylla, Revue des affaires européennes 2015 p.589-596 (FR)
- Ciampi, Annalisa: Il caso Taricco impone la disapplicazione delle garanzie della prescrizione: un problema di rapporti fra diritto dell'UE e diritto nazionale e di tutela dei diritti fondamentali, non solo di diritto processuale internazionale, Il Corriere giuridico 2016 p.113-121 (IT)
- Billis, Emmanouil: The European Court of Justice: A “Quasi-Constitutional Court” in Criminal Matters? The Taricco Judgment and Its Shortcomings, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2016 Vol. 7 p.20-38 (EN)
- Giuffrida, Fabio: The Limitation Period of Crimes: Same Old Italian Story, New Intriguing European Answers – Case Note on C-105/14, Taricco, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2016 Vol. 7 p.100-112 (EN)
- Van Eijsden, Arjo: Taricco. Limitation period for criminal offences in relation to VAT. Italian law is liable to affect the financial interests of the EU, Highlights & Insights on European Taxation 2016 nº 3 p.14-16 (EN)
- Caianiello, Michele: Dum Romae (et Brucsellae) Consulitur…, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 2016 p.1 –17 (EN)
- Timmerman, Mikhel: Balancing effective criminal sanctions with effective fundamental rights protection in cases of VAT fraud: Taricco, Common Market Law Review 2016 p.779–796 (EN)
- Martín Jiménez, Adolfo: Jurisprudencia del tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - 2. Principios generales y derechos fundamentales en el derecho tributario de la UE, Revista española de Derecho Financiero 2016 n°169 p. 235-239 (ES)
- Klip, A.H.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2016 Afl.34/35 p.4348-4350 (NL)
- Reiß, Wolfram: Unionsrechtlich gebotene Bestrafung und Besteuerung sine lege und contra legem, Umsatzsteuer-Rundschau 2016 p.342-359 (DE)
- Rodríguez-Bereijo León, María: La Sentencia del TJUE en el caso "Ivo Taricco y Otros" y la aplicación extensiva del principio de efectividad en la relación del fraude en el IVA, Revista española de Derecho Europeo 2016 nº58 p.171-198 (ES)
- Cupelli, Cristiano: Il caso Taricco e il controlimite della riserva di legge in materia penale, Giurisprudenza costituzionale 2016 p.419-446 (IT)
- Bassini, Marco: Prescrizione e principio di legalità nell'ordine costituzionale europeo. Note critiche alla sentenza Taricco, La Carta dei diritti dell'Unione Europea e le altre Carte (Ed. Giappichelli - Torino) 2016 p.357-383 (IT)
- Камишева, Стефанова: Нов тласък в борбата срещу измамите, засягащи финансовите интереси на ЕС, Европейски правен преглед 2016 nº XIV p.124-143 (BG)
- Mareș, Mihai ; Mazilu-Babel, Mihaela: CJUE. C-105/14 Taricco și alții. Infracțiuni în domeniul TVA. Termen de prescripție specială. Interesele financiare ale Uniunii. Articolul 49 din Cartă. Efectul articolului 325 TFUE. Inaplicabilitate de drept a normelor naționale contrare versus Legea penală mai favorabilă, Pandectele Romane: repertoriu trimestrial de jurisprudenta, doctrina si legislatie 2016Vol. 8 p.63-80 (RO)
- Staffler, Lukas: Kriminalpolitische Kontrollbefugnis von Tatgerichten beim Schutz finanzieller Interessen der EU im Lichte der Gewaltenteilung, Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung 2016 p.4-7 (DE)
- Gambardella, Marco: Caso Taricco e garanzie costituzionali ex art. 25 cost., Cassazione penale 2016 p.1462-1480 (IT)
- Lupo, Ernesto: La primauté del diritto dell'UE e l'ordinamento penale nazionale (riflessioni sulla sentenza Taricco), Il filo delle tutele nel dedalo d'Europa (Ed. Scientifica - Napoli) 2016 p.33-52 (IT)
- Venegoni, Andrea: Ancora sul caso Taricco : la prescrizione tra il diritto a tutela delle finanze dell'Unione ed il diritto penale nazionale, Il filo delle tutele nel dedalo d'Europa (Ed. Scientifica - Napoli) 2016 p.487-502 (IT)
- Savvaidou, Katerina: I prothesmia paragrafis tou dikaiomatos tou Dimosiou gia tin epivoli kyroseon se periptosi forodiafygis ston tomea tou FPA, Dikaio Epicheiriseon & Etairion 2017 p.177-182 (EL)
- Mori, Paola: La Corte costituzionale chiede alla Corte di giustizia di rivedere la sentenza Taricco : difesa dei controlimiti o rifiuto delle limitazioni di sovranità in materia penale ?, Rivista di diritto internazionale 2017 p.407-446 (IT)
- Manacorda, Stefano: Le garanzie penalistiche nei rapporti con il diritto dell'Unione e il problematico ricorso al rinvio pregiudiziale : una lettura contestualizzata del caso Taricco, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.177-202 (IT)
- Manes, Vittorio: La "svolta" Taricco e la potenziale "sovversione di sistema" : le ragioni dei controlimiti, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.203-232 (IT)
- Viganò, Francesco: Il caso Taricco davanti alla Corte costituzionale : qualche riflessione sul merito delle questioni, e sulla reale posta in gioco, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.233-272 (IT)
- Bin, Roberto: Taricco, una sentenza sbagliata : come venirne fuori ?, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.291-300 (IT)
- Chessa, Omar: Meglio tardi che mai la dogmatica dei controlimiti e il caso Taricco, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.301-329 (IT)
- Cupelli, Cristiano: Il caso Taricco e il controlimite della riserva di legge in materia penale, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.331-358 (IT)
- Faraguna, Pietro: Il caso Taricco : controlimiti in tre dimensioni, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.359-377 (IT)
- Gambardella, Marco: Il caso Taricco : obblighi di disapplicazione in malam partem e compatibilità con i principi costituzionali della riserva di legge e di irretroattività, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.379-406 (IT)
- Picotti, Lorenzo: Riflessioni sul caso Taricco : dalla "virtuosa indignazione" al rilancio del diritto penale europeo, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.445-472 (IT)
- Sotis, Carlo: Il limite come controlimite. Riflessioni sulla vicenda Taricco, I controlimiti - Primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Ed. Jovene editore) 2017 p.495-514 (IT)
- Gallo, Daniele: Controlimiti, identità nazionale e i rapporti di forza tra primato ed effetto diretto nella saga Taricco, Il diritto dell'Unione Europea 2017 p.249-277 (IT)
- Grisostolo, Francesco ; Scarcella, Luisa: ‘ Trouble Always Comes in Threes ’ : The Taricco Case Saga and the Italian Limitation Period in VAT Fraud, Intertax 2017 p.701-713 (EN)
- Perlo, Nicoletta: L'affaire Tarico: la voie italienne pour préserver la collaboration des juges dans l'Union européenne, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2017 n°4 p.739-768 (FR)
- Orzan, Massimo Francesco: Interessi finanziari dell'UE e principio di legalità dei reati e delle pene : la sentenza Taricco II, Giurisprudenza italiana 2018 p.22-24 (IT)
- Manacorda, Stefano: The Taricco saga: A risk or an opportunity for European Criminal Law?, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2018 Vol. 9 p.4–11 (EN)
- Manes, Vittorio: Some lessons from the Taricco saga, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2018 Vol. 9 p.12–17 (EN)
- Mitsilegas, Valsamis: Judicial dialogue in three silences Unpacking Taricco, New Journal of European Criminal Law 2018 Vol. 9 p. 38–42 (EN)
- Gambardella, Marco: La sentenza Taricco 2: obbligo di disapplicazione in malam partem “a meno che” non comporti una violazione del principio di legalità, Cassazione penale 2018 p.114-130 (EN, IT)
- Amalfitano, Chiara: La vicenda Taricco e il dialogo (?) tra giudici nazionali e Corte di giustizia, Il diritto dell'Unione Europea 2018 p.153-202 (IT)
- Montserrat Pappalettere, Eleonora: La sentenza “Taricco bis”: dalla contrapposizione degli ordinamenti al bilanciamento dei princìpi attraverso il dialogo, Il diritto dell'Unione Europea 2018 p.203-221 (IT)
- Lazzerini, Nicole: Il rapporto tra primato del diritto dell'Unione e tutela costituzionale dei diritti fondamentali nella sentenza Taricco-bis: buona la seconda?, Rivista di diritto internazionale 2018 p.234-242 (IT)
- Labayle, Henri: Du dialogue des juges à la diplomatie judiciaire entre juridictions constitutionnelles : la saga Taricco devant la Cour de justice, Revue française de droit administratif 2018 p.521-529 (FR)
- Klein, Marvin: Friedensgrüße aus Luxemburg : Neue Entwicklungen im europäischen Grundrechteverbund, Die öffentliche Verwaltung 2018 p.605-612 (DE)
- Szaboova, Gabriela: Supremacy and National Identity after the Taricco II Judgement - Does the Identity Clause have the Potential to Reverse the Established Case Law on Supremacy of EU Law?, Europarättslig tidskrift 2018 nº 3 p.455-465 (EN)
- Matějec, Martin: Přednost unijního práva a doktrína controlimiti ve světle rozsudku Taricco, Jurisprudence : specialista na komentování judikatury 2018 nº 3 p.19-25 (CS)
- Staffler, Lukas: Verfassungsidentität und strafrechtliche Verjährung, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 2018 n° 45 p.613-619 (DE)
- Bonelli, Matteo: The Taricco saga and the consolidation of judicial dialogue in the European Union, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2018 Vol.25, N°3 p.357-373 (EN)
- Piccirilli, Giovanni: The "Taricco Saga" : the Italian Constitutional Court continues its European journey, European Constitutional Law Review 2018 Vol.14, Issue 4 p.814-833 (EN)
- Manacorda, Stefano: Prescrizione e controlimiti: prove di un dialogo construens negli sviluppi del caso Taricco, La "materia penale" tra diritto nazionale ed europeo (G. Giappichelli editore - Torino) 2018 p.419-447 (IT)
- Epidendio, Tommaso E.: PRESCRIZIONE, LEGALITÀ E DIRITTO GIURISPRUDENZIALE: LA "CRISI" DEL DIRITTO PENALE TRA LE CORTI, La "materia penale" tra diritto nazionale ed europeo (G. Giappichelli editore - Torino) 2018 p.449-492 (IT)
- Daniele, Luigi: La sentenza "Taricco" torna davanti alla Corte di Giustizia UE, Integrazione europea e sovranazionalità 2018 p. 87-102 (IT)
- Mori, Paola: Il principio di legalità e equalità della legge il ruolo del giudice comune tra Corte constituzionale e Corti europee, Integrazione europea e sovranazionalità 2018 p. 103-120 (IT)
- Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana: The Taricco affair : a dialogue between the deaf and the dumb : a proposal to strengthen cooperation between the ECJ and national courts, The global community : yearbook of international law and jurisprudence 2018 2019 p.3-17 (EN)
- Sacchetto, Claudio: La supériorité des traités européens et les principes constitutionnels fondamentaux italiens dans la législation pénale fiscale : l’affaire de la Cour de justice Taricco. (C-105/14), Revue européenne et internationale de droit fiscal 2019 p. 390-392 (FR)
- Pellegrini, Daniele: I controlimiti al primato del diritto dell’Unione europea nel dialogo tra le Corti, Firenze University Press 2021, p. 82-97 (IT)
- Tizzano, Antonio: Les relations entre juridictions en Europe, Building the European Union: The Jurist’s View of the Union’s Evolution Hart Publishing, 2021, p. 223-236 (FR)
- Marciano, Alessandro: The Dialogue between Courts in the so-called Taricco Saga, Building the European Union: The Jurist’s View of the Union’s Evolution Hart Publishing, 2021, p. 237-244 (EN)
- Blanquet, Marc: 57. Droits fondamentaux - Pluralisme juridique - Double préjudicialité. CJUE, gr. ch., 8 sept. 2015, n° C-105/14, Procédure pénale contre lvo Taricco e.a et CJUE, gr. ch., 5 déc. 2017, n° C-42/17, Procédure pénale contre M.A.S. et M.B., Les grands arrêts de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne. Droit constitutionnel et institutionnel de l'Union européenne (Dalloz, 2e édition) 2023, p. 933-942 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Tribunale di Cuneo - Italy
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - State aid
- Taxation
- - Value added tax
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Berger
Advocate General
Kokott
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion