Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.02 Marks devoid of any distinctive character
4.11.03.01.02.03 Other marks
4.11.03.01.02.03.03 |
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.13 Signs examined
4.11.03.01.13.02 Marks devoid of any distinctive character
4.11.03.01.13.02.03 Three-dimensional marks |
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.12 Acquisition of distinctive character through use |
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.12 Acquisition of distinctive character through use |
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.13 Signs examined
4.11.03.01.13.12 Acquisition of distinctive character through use
4.11.03.01.13.12.03 Three-dimensional marks |
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Regulation 207/2009
: paragraph 1
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A01P2 : paragraph 77
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A07P1LB : paragraphs 26, 33, 39, 55, 66 - 68, 77
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A07P1LC : paragraphs 66, 67
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A07P1LD : paragraphs 66, 67
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A07P2 : paragraph 77
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A07P3 : paragraphs 26, 60, 66 - 68, 70, 73, 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/01
-N53 : paragraph 38
-
General Court - Judgment T -194/01
-N54 : paragraph 44
-
General Court - Judgment T -399/02
-N24 : paragraph 38
-
General Court - Judgment T -399/02
-N25 : paragraph 44
-
General Court - Judgment T -399/02
-N30 : paragraph 48
-
General Court - Judgment T -399/02
-N31 : paragraph 49
-
General Court - Judgment T -399/02
-N32 : paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -353/03
: paragraphs 60, 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -353/03
-N30 : paragraph 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/05
-N81 : paragraph 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/05
-N82 : paragraph 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/05
-N83 : paragraph 77
-
General Court - Judgment T -141/06
-N36 : paragraph 68
-
General Court - Judgment T -141/06
-N41 : paragraph 72
-
General Court - Judgment T -141/06
-N42 : paragraph 72
-
General Court - Judgment T -351/07
-N27 : paragraph 51
-
General Court - Judgment T -378/07
-N45 : paragraph 77
-
General Court - Judgment T -391/07
-N60 : paragraph 51
-
General Court - Judgment T -7/09
-N38 : paragraph 66
-
General Court - Judgment T -7/09
-N39 : paragraph 69
-
General Court - Judgment T -7/09
-N40 : paragraph 67
-
General Court - Judgment T -7/09
-N41 : paragraph 70
-
General Court - Judgment T -7/09
-N42 : paragraph 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10
-N42 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10
-N43 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10
-N45 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10
-N46 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10
-N47 : paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10
-N49 : paragraph 31
-
General Court - Judgment T -409/10
-N74 : paragraph 66
-
General Court - Judgment T -409/10
-N75 : paragraph 69
-
General Court - Judgment T -409/10
-N76 : paragraph 67
-
General Court - Judgment T -409/10
-N77 : paragraph 70
-
General Court - Judgment T -409/10
-N78 : paragraph 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/11
-N62 : paragraph 78
-
General Court - Judgment T -640/11
-N27 : paragraph 55
-
General Court - Judgment T -66/13
-N66 : paragraph 55
-
General Court - Judgment T -66/13
-N67 : paragraph 55
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
24/02/2016
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 118 from 04.04.2016, p.26
Application: OJ C 282 from 25.08.2014, p.39
Name of the parties
Coca-Cola v OHIM (Forme d'une bouteille à contours sans cannelures)
Notes on Academic Writings
- Rauscher, Oliver: EuG: Kein Markenschutz für ungeriffelte Coca-Cola-Konturflasche, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht PRAX 2016 Heft 5 p.100 (DE)
- Ruess, Peter: EuG: Kein Markenschutz für nicht geriffelte Coca-Cola-Flasche, Betriebs-Berater 2016 p.656 (DE)
- Mouron, Philippe: Pas de distinctivité pour la bouteille de Coca-Cola sans cannelures comme marque 3D, Droit de l'immatériel : informatique, médias, communication 2016 Juin nº 127 p.8-13 (FR)
- Roset, Sébastien: Adidas et Coca Cola : appréciation casuistique du critère distinctif entre marques concurrentes, Europe 2016 Avril Comm. nº 4 p.34 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- - Trade marks
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
huitième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Wetter
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available