Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU : paragraph 23
• TFEU, Article 101 : paragraphs 1, 3, 9, 14, 16, 17, 26, 30, 39, 40
• TFEU, Article 101 -P1 : paragraphs 10, 18 - 22, 24, 27, 29, 31 - 35, 41
• TFEU, Article 102 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/69 -N112 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/75 : paragraph 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/78 -N86 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/83 : paragraph 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/12 : paragraph 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/12 -N40 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -609/13 -N70 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -609/13 -N71 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -609/13 -N72 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/14 -N32 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -702/19 -N81 : paragraph 26

Operative part

• Interprets : 12008P-article -P1

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 81 : point 2
  
• TFEU, Article 82 : point 2
  
• TFEU, Article 101 : points 1, 8, 24, 25, 29 - 31, 43, 45 - 47
  
• TFEU, Article 101 -P1 : points 19, 26 - 28
  
• TFEU, Article 102 : point 31
  
• Regulation 1/2003 : point 26
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P3 : point 46
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A25 : point 2
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A25P1 : point 24
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A25P2 : point 24
  
• Directive 2019/1 -A29 : point 25
  
• Directive 2019/1 -C70 : point 25
  
• Regulation 1/2019 -A34P1 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/75 : points 14, 32, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/75 -N30 : points 14, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/75 -N31 : points 14, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/83 : points 30, 32, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/83 -N17 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/83 -N18 : point 30
  
• General Court - Judgment T -29/92 -N151 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 : points 33, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 -N38 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 -N39 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/08 -N43 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/09 -N48 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/09 -N49 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/09 -N50 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/09 -N51 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -352/09 -N52 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -17/10 -N54 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -681/11 -N40 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/12 : points 32, 34, 35, 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/12 -N32 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/12 -N33 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/12 -N40 : points 13, 31
  
• Court of Justice - View C-2/13 -N149 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/14 -N56 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -773/18 -N28 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/21 : point 31
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 13/06/2019

Date of the Opinion

• 10/09/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/01/2021

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Idot, Laurence: Concurrence - Durée de l'entente, Europe 2021, nº 3 Mars, comm. 97 (FR)
2. Gilliam, Sophie: Determining the duration of an infringement of Article 101 TFEU in Bid Rigging Cases : case C-450/19 Kilpailu-ja kuluttajavirasto, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2021 Vol. 12 nº 8 p. 633-635 (EN)
3. Kappel, Jan ; Junkers, Florian: Kartellbußen : keine Verfolgung “bis in alle Ewigkeit”! : EuGH stärkt Verjährungseinwand : C-450/19 – Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto, Betriebs-Berater 2021 p. 399-403 (DE)
4. Mentula, Arttu: Finnish Eltel precedent case and limitation period in cartel matters : Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto v Eltel Group Oy (C-450/19), European Competition Law Review 2022 p. 230-237 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Korkein hallinto-oikeus - Finland

Subject-matter

• Competition
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

• Finnish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French