Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2015

Siemag Tecberg Group GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Winder Controls — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(c) and (b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No ° 207/2009 — Article 135a of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Request for a hearing made prematurely in the application

Case T‑593/13


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
27/02/2015 Siemag Tecberg Group v OHIM (Winder Controls)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2015:58
30/01/2015 Siemag Tecberg Group v OHIM (Winder Controls)
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2015:58
30/01/2015 Siemag Tecberg Group v OHIM (Winder Controls)
Application (OJ)
17/01/2014 Siemag Tecberg Group v OHIM (Winder Controls)
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Community trade mark – Action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 5 September 2013 in Case R 1261/20134 dismissing the appeal against the examiner’s decision refusing registration of the word mark ‘Winder Controls’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 35, 37, 41 and 42.

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.03 Descriptive marks
          4.11.03.01.03.02
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.03 Descriptive marks
          4.11.03.01.03.01
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.03 Descriptive marks
          4.11.03.01.03.04 null
            4.11.03.01.03.04.00
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.13 Signs examined
          4.11.03.01.13.03 Descriptive marks
            4.11.03.01.13.03.01 Word marks
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.03 Descriptive marks
          4.11.03.01.03.01
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
        4.11.03.01.00 General


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 14/11/2013

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

30/01/2015


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 89 from 16.03.2015, p.20

Application: OJ C 31 from 01.02.2014, p.12

Name of the parties

Siemag Tecberg Group v OHIM (Winder Controls)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

sixième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Dehousse

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available