Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3.04.01.03 Exclusive nature of the role of the national court in making the reference
|
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.01 Reference to the Court of Justice
3.04.01.03 Exclusive nature of the role of the national court in making the reference
|
|
|
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
4.06.01.03 Asylum policy
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
4.06.01.04 Immigration policy
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
4.06.01.03 Asylum policy
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
4.06.01.04 Immigration policy
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraph 33
-
Directive 2003/9
: paragraphs 52, 55, 63
-
Directive 2003/9
-A07 : paragraph 54
-
Directive 2003/9
-A07P1 : paragraph 53
-
Directive 2003/9
-A07P3 : paragraphs 53, 59
-
Directive 2003/9
-A21 : paragraph 54
-
Directive 2005/85
: paragraphs 40, 49, 50, 52, 55, 63
-
Directive 2005/85
-A01 : paragraphs 42, 45
-
Directive 2005/85
-A07P1 : paragraphs 45 - 48
-
Directive 2005/85
-A07P2 : paragraph 46
-
Directive 2005/85
-A18P1 : paragraphs 54, 58
-
Directive 2005/85
-A23P4LJ : paragraph 61
-
Directive 2005/85
-A39P3 : paragraph 47
-
Directive 2008/115
: paragraphs 32, 37, 48, 52, 60
-
Directive 2008/115
-A02P1 : paragraphs 1, 31, 40, 43, 49
-
Directive 2008/115
-A03L2 : paragraph 43
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15 : paragraphs 36, 50, 57, 62, 63
-
Directive 2008/115
-C2 : paragraph 42
-
Directive 2008/115
-C9 : paragraphs 1, 31, 40, 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/09
: paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/11
: paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/11
: paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11
: paragraphs 33, 34
Operative part
Opinion
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A104BISL1 : point 34
-
Directive 2003/9
-A07P1 : point 69
-
Directive 2003/9
-A07P3 : points 71, 73, 81
-
Directive 2005/85
: points 1, 3, 58, 79, 81
-
Directive 2005/85
-A07P1 : points 62, 63
-
Directive 2005/85
-A07P2 : point 63
-
Directive 2005/85
-A18P1 : point 72
-
Directive 2005/85
-A18P2 : point 72
-
Directive 2005/85
-A23P4 : point 80
-
Directive 2005/85
-C1 : point 77
-
Directive 2005/85
-C13 : point 62
-
Directive 2008/115
: point 58
-
Directive 2008/115
-A02P1 : points 1, 62
-
Directive 2008/115
-A03PT2 : point 62
-
Directive 2008/115
-A05 : point 59
-
Directive 2008/115
-A09 : point 59
-
Directive 2008/115
-A15 : points 60, 79, 80
-
Directive 2008/115
-A16 : points 79, 80
-
Directive 2008/115
-A17 : points 79, 80
-
Directive 2008/115
-A18 : points 79, 80
-
Directive 2008/115
-C9 : points 1, 64
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
30/05/2013
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 65 from 03.03.2012, p.2
Judgment: OJ C 225 from 03.08.2013, p.13
Name of the parties
Arslan
Notes on Academic Writings
- Gazin, Fabienne: Rétention des demandeurs d'asile. La Cour tente de trouver un équilibre entre deux impératifs contraires : l'encadrement des rétentions des demandeurs d'asile et le risque d'abus de droit, Europe 2013 Juillet Comm. nº 7 p.33-34 (FR)
- Aubert, Michel ; Broussy, Emmanuelle ; Cassagnabère, Hervé: Chronique de jurisprudence de la CJUE. La directive Retour est inapplicable à un demandeur d'asile, mais la rétention dont il faisait l'objet sur le fondement de cette directive avant le dépôt de sa demande peut être prolongée après ce dépôt sur le fondement de dispositions nationales qui sont compatibles avec les directives régissant l'asile, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2013 p.1689-1690 (FR)
- Pelacani, Gracy: Rimpatrio, allontanamento e diritto d'asilo a bilanciamento: i motivi che giustificano il trattenimento predisposto al fine di allontanare o rimpatriare il richiedente protezione internazionale, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2013 p.949-954 (IT)
- Dumitraşcu, Augustina: Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene. Hotărârea Curţii de Justiţie Europene din 30 mai 2013, cauza nr. C-534/11, Curierul Judiciar 2013 p.471 (RO)
- Hörich, Carsten ; Bergmann, Marcus: Rückführung illegal aufhältiger Drittstaatsangehöriger, Asylbewerber, Haft EZAR. NF 57 Nr. 26, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2013 p.292-297 (DE)
- González Saquero, Pablo: Jurisprudencia – Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, Revista española de Derecho Europeo 2013 nº 47 p.193-229 (ES)
- Cornelisse, Galina: Rechtspraak Vreemdelingenrecht 2013 (Ed. Ars Aequi Libri - Nijmegen) 2013 p.447-449 (NL)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2014 nº 207 p.105-114 (FR)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº 3 p.114-130 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Nejvyšší správní soud - Czech Republic
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Immigration policy
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - asylum policy
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (04/11/1950), art. 5, par. 1
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
troisième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Ilešič
Advocate General
Wathelet
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion