Reports of Cases
2010 I-01107
Subject-matter
Interpretation of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77) and of Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition, 1968 (II), p. 475) – Right of residence in the United Kingdom of a Union citizen no longer having the status of a worker and no longer able to establish a right of residence in accordance with the provisions on the freedom of movement of workers – Right for the child of such a citizen to remain in the United Kingdom in order to complete a vocational training course – Right of the mother to remain there as guardian with the child
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.01 Workers
4.04.01.01 Equal treatment
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.01 Workers
4.04.01.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.01 Workers
4.04.01.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.01 Workers
4.04.01.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.01 Workers
4.04.01.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 18
: paragraph 65
-
Regulation 1612/68
: paragraphs 39, 66, 67
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A10 : paragraphs 47, 49, 54, 57
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A10P1LA : paragraph 46
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A11 : paragraphs 47, 57
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A12 : paragraphs 1, 33, 35 - 39, 44, 46 - 54, 56, 57, 59 - 61, 65, 67, 70, 72 - 74, 77 - 84
-
Directive 90/364
: paragraph 65
-
Regulation 2434/92
: paragraph 1
-
Directive 2004/38
: paragraphs 1, 33, 54, 56 - 61, 69
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07 : paragraph 60
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1LB : paragraph 42
-
Directive 2004/38
-A12P3 : paragraph 68
-
Directive 2004/38
-A24P1 : paragraph 59
-
Directive 2004/38
-C3 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/83
: paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/86
: paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/87
: paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/94
: paragraphs 47, 48, 52, 80 - 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99
: paragraphs 36 - 39, 46, 51, 54, 58, 65 - 67, 74, 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08
: paragraph 60
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 12
: point 122
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 18
: points 68, 122
-
Regulation 1612/68
: points 70, 71
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A07P2 : point 70
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A10 : point 47
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A10P1 : point 69
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A10P1LA : points 40, 104, 118
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A10P3 : point 69
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A11 : points 47, 69
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A12 : points 35, 38 - 43, 46 - 48, 51 - 59, 63, 67, 68, 70, 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 90 - 93, 95 - 97, 100 - 102, 123
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A12P1 : point 61
-
Regulation 1612/68
-A12P2 : point 61
-
Regulation 1612/68
-C5 : point 43
-
Directive 90/364
-A01 : point 118
-
Directive 90/364
-A01P1 : point 71
-
Directive 90/364
-A02PT2LA : point 118
-
Directive 90/364
-A19 : point 120
-
Directive 90/364
-A37 : point 119
-
Directive 90/364
-C17 : point 119
-
Directive 90/365
-A01P1 : point 71
-
Directive 93/96
-A01 : point 71
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000)
-A07 : point 60
-
Directive 2004/38
: points 46 - 51, 53, 56, 57, 74 - 77, 79, 80, 82, 111, 114
-
Directive 2004/38
-A01 : point 48
-
Directive 2004/38
-A02PT2LC : points 40, 51, 54, 104
-
Directive 2004/38
-A03P1 : point 48
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1LA : points 76, 118
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1LB : points 76, 78, 118
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1LC : points 76, 78
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1LD : points 40, 51, 54, 76, 118
-
Directive 2004/38
-A12P1L2 : point 78
-
Directive 2004/38
-A12P2L2 : point 78
-
Directive 2004/38
-A12P3 : points 51, 52, 55, 56, 78, 79, 100
-
Directive 2004/38
-A13P1L2 : point 78
-
Directive 2004/38
-A13P2L2 : point 78
-
Directive 2004/38
-A14P3 : point 82
-
Directive 2004/38
-A16 : points 51, 107, 120
-
Directive 2004/38
-A16P1 : points 116, 119
-
Directive 2004/38
-A35 : point 83
-
Directive 2004/38
-C10 : point 82
-
Directive 2004/38
-C3 : points 48, 56, 74
-
Directive 2004/38
-C31 : point 60
-
Directive 2004/38
-C4 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/73
: point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/74
: point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/83
: point 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/84
: point 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/86
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/86
: points 38, 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/86
: point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/86
: point 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/87
: points 39, 43, 45, 46, 68, 70, 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/89
: points 43, 68, 70, 104
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90
: points 49, 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/94
: points 38, 40, 45, 46, 54, 68, 70, 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/97
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -478/98
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99
: points 39, 42 - 45, 46, 55, 58 - 61, 67, 68, 74, 82, 92, 93, 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/99
: point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/00
: point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -162/00
: point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/01
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/01
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/02
: point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02
: points 49, 59, 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/02
: points 40, 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/02
: points 82, 94, 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -540/03
: point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/04
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/05
: point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05
: points 42, 49, 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
: point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/07
: point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/08
: point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -123/08
: point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08
: points 56, 60, 74, 83
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
23/02/2010
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 32 from 07.02.2009, p.14
Judgment: OJ C 100 from 17.04.2010, p.6
Name of the parties
Teixeira
Notes on Academic Writings
- Michel, Valérie: Rejet d'une interprétation régressive de la jurisprudence Baumbast, Europe 2010 Avril Comm. nº 131 p.13-14 (FR)
- Cavallini, Joël: Absence de ressources suffisantes et maintien du droit de séjour d'un ressortissant européen et de sa famille, La semaine juridique - Social 2010 nº 1183 p.23-25 (FR)
- Koufaki, Ioanna: Ekfraseis tis evropaikis ithageneias ypo to prisma tou sevasmou tis oikogeneiakis zois, Nomiko Vima 2010 p.543-545 (EL)
- Mok, M.R.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2010 nº 307 (NL)
- Starup, Peter ; Elsmore, Matthew J.: Taking a Logical or Giant Step Forward? Comment on Ibrahim and Teixeira, European Law Review 2010 p.571-588 (EN)
- Cortés Martín, José Manuel: Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Uníon Europea, Enero - Abril 2010, Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 2010 nº 34 p.1-61 (ES)
- Cortés Martín, José Manuel: Los clubes pueden reclamar una compensación por la formación de jóvenes jugadores, aunque debe ser proporcional a los gastos soportados para formar tanto a los futuros profesionales como a los que jamás llegarán a serlo - STJUE (Gran Sala) de 16 de marzo de 2010, Olympique Lyonnais, C-325/08, y Maria Teixeira, C-480/08, Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 2010 nº 36 p.607-609 (ES)
- O'Brien, Charlotte: Case C-310/08, London Borough of Harrow v. Nimco Hassan Ibrahim and Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 23 February 2010, nyr; Case C-480/08, Maria Teixeira v. London Borough of Lambeth and Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 23 February 2010, nyr, Common Market Law Review 2011 Vol. 48 Nº 1 p.203-225 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - United Kingdom
Subject-matter
- Citizenship of the Union
- - Right of entry and residence
- Freedom of movement for workers
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Rosas
Advocate General
Kokott
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion