Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC (Case COMP/F/38.456 – Bitumen – Netherlands) concerning agreements fixing the gross price of road bitumen in the Netherlands and establishing a uniform minimum rebate for road construction companies belonging to the cartel and a lower maximum rebate for other road construction companies
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.08 Procedural rules
3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
1.04.03.49 Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.49 Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.00 EU competition rules
4.08.00.06 Definition of undertaking
|
|
|
1.01.02.01 Principle of equality and non-discrimination
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.01 Sources of EU law
1.01.02 General principles of law
1.01.02.01 Principle of equality and non-discrimination
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.00 EU competition rules
4.08.00.06 Definition of undertaking
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.04 null
4.08.01.07.02.04.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
4.08.03.03.04 Fines for infringement of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (Articles 81 EC and 82 EC)
4.08.03.03.04.02 Basic amount
4.08.03.03.04.02.02 Basic amount according to the 1998 Guidelines
4.08.03.03.04.02.02.04 Duration of the infringement
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraphs 37, 39, 60, 73
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82
: paragraph 39
-
General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A44P1LC : paragraphs 22, 26
-
General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A48P2 : paragraph 22
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01)
-A01 : paragraph 81
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A07 : paragraph 60
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A23P3 : paragraphs 50, 60, 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/78
: paragraph 50
-
General Court - Judgment T -150/89
: paragraph 82
-
General Court - Judgment T -229/94
: paragraph 82
-
General Court - Judgment T -305/94
: paragraph 25
-
General Court - Judgment T -352/94
: paragraph 23
-
General Court - Judgment T -84/96
: paragraph 25
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/98
: paragraphs 41, 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/98
: paragraph 38
-
General Court - Judgment T -145/98
: paragraph 23
-
General Court - Order T -154/98
: paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/99
: paragraph 25
-
General Court - Judgment T -9/99
: paragraph 37
-
General Court - Judgment T -31/99
: paragraph 49
-
General Court - Judgment T -231/99
: paragraph 25
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/00
: paragraph 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/00
: paragraphs 37, 59
-
General Court - Judgment T -195/00
: paragraph 24
-
General Court - Judgment T -157/01
: paragraphs 23, 24
-
General Court - Judgment T -203/01
: paragraphs 39, 48
-
General Court - Judgment T -209/01
: paragraph 26
-
General Court - Judgment T -241/01
: paragraph 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/02
: paragraphs 38, 45 - 47
-
General Court - Judgment T -43/02
: paragraph 45
-
General Court - Judgment T -259/02
: paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/04
: paragraph 59
-
General Court - Judgment T -99/04
: paragraph 47
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -217/05
: paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/06
: paragraph 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -125/07
: paragraph 48
-
General Court - Judgment T -122/07
: paragraph 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/08
: paragraphs 38 - 42, 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/09
: paragraphs 42, 56
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
27/09/2012
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 20 from 27.01.2007, p.23
Judgment: OJ C 355 from 17.11.2012, p.16
Name of the parties
Koninklijke BAM Groep v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Cartels et « double entente horizontale », Europe 2012 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.36-38 (FR)
- Robin, Catherine: Présomption d'influence déterminante et bien-fondé de la décision d'imputabilité de l'infraction aux sociétés mères, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2013 nº 34 p.32 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
sixième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Soldevila Fragoso
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available