Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
1.
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.09 Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
1.09.03 Right of entry and of residence
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.09 Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
1.09.03 Right of entry and of residence
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.09 Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
1.09.03 Right of entry and of residence
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.09 Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
1.09.03 Right of entry and of residence
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.09 Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
1.09.03 Right of entry and of residence
1.09.03.01 Detailed rules governing the exercise of the right of entry and of residence
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7
: paragraph 70
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 24
-P2 : paragraph 70
-
TFEU, Article 20
: paragraphs 1, 39, 48, 57 - 61, 70, 72 - 76, 78
-
TFEU, Article 21
: paragraphs 49, 56
-
TFEU, Article 21
-P1 : paragraphs 49, 52, 54
-
Directive 2004/38
: paragraphs 49, 55
-
Directive 2004/38
-A02 : paragraph 3
-
Directive 2004/38
-A02PT2 : paragraph 52
-
Directive 2004/38
-A03P1 : paragraph 4
-
Directive 2004/38
-A05 : paragraphs 5, 56
-
Directive 2004/38
-A06 : paragraph 56
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07 : paragraph 56
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1 : paragraph 6
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P2 : paragraph 6
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
: paragraphs 33, 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N42 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N43 : paragraphs 63, 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N44 : paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N45 : paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09
-N24 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09
-N28 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09
-N48 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
: paragraphs 33, 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N56 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N63 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N65 : paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N66 : paragraphs 63, 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N67 : paragraphs 63, 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N41 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N43 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N44 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N45 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N51 : paragraph 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N56 : paragraphs 68, 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/11
-N38 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/12
-N41 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/12
-N20 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -423/12
-N25 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -423/12
-N26 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -423/12
-N27 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12
-N35 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12
-N50 : paragraphs 54, 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -457/12
-N34 : paragraph 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13
-N36 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14
-N72 : paragraph 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14
-N73 : paragraph 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14
-N74 : paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14
-N75 : paragraph 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14
-N78 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14
-N27 : paragraph 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14
-N28 : paragraph 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14
-N29 : paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -304/14
-N30 : paragraph 64
Operative part
Opinion
-
EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 52
: point 66
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 39
: point 66
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7
: points 6, 100
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 24
-P2 : point 100
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : point 44
-
TFEU, Article 20
: points 1, 36, 46, 56, 58, 59, 62, 74, 77 - 79, 84, 86, 87, 94, 103, 108, 112, 114
-
TFEU, Article 20
-P1 : point 4
-
TFEU, Article 20
-P2LA : point 4
-
TFEU, Article 21
: points 46, 58, 73
-
TFEU, Article 21
-P1 : points 5, 66, 67, 72, 75
-
TFEU, Article 45
: point 66
-
TFEU, Article 49
: point 66
-
TEU, Article 3
-P3L1 : point 44
-
TEU, Article 3
-P3L2 : point 44
-
Regulation 1612/68
: point 66
-
Directive 73/148
: point 66
-
Regulation 2201/2003
: point 45
-
Directive 2004/38
: points 58, 61, 64, 66, 69, 78
-
Directive 2004/38
-A02PT2 : point 68
-
Directive 2004/38
-A03P1 : points 75, 85
-
Directive 2004/38
-A05 : point 67
-
Directive 2004/38
-A05P1 : points 7, 71, 72
-
Directive 2004/38
-A05P4 : points 7, 71, 72
-
Directive 2004/38
-A06 : points 67, 73
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P1 : point 66
-
Directive 2004/38
-A07P2 : point 66
-
Directive 2004/38
-A10 : point 71
-
Directive 2004/38
-A16P1 : point 66
-
Directive 2004/38
-A16P2 : point 66
-
Directive 2004/38
-C3 : point 60
-
Directive 2004/38
-C5 : point 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -369/90
-N29 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -91/92
: point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -214/94
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -4/95
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -65/95
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99
-N84 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99
-N85 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/99
-N91 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -200/02
: point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/02
-N21 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02
-N20 : points 46, 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02
-N21 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02
-N26 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02
-N32 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02
-N45 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -540/03
-N37 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -50/06
-N42 : point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06
-N39 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06
-N40 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06
-N41 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06
-N42 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06
-N52 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -523/07
-N61 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -523/07
-N64 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08
-N83 : point 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08
-N84 : point 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/08
-N39 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/08
-N54 : point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/08
-N55 : point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/08
-N56 : point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
: points 2, 35, 55, 84, 88, 91, 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N42 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N43 : points 88, 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N44 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/09
-N45 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11
-N66 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11
-N69 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11
-N71 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11
-N72 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
: points 35, 55, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N65 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N66 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N67 : points 88, 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/11
-N72 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N48 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N56 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N76 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N77 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11
-N78 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/12
-N41 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/12
-N20 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/12
-N22 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/12
-N28 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/12
-N32 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -86/12
-N33 : point 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/12
-N34 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/12
-N35 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/12
-N36 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/12
-N37 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12
-N35 : point 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12
-N36 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -202/13
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13
: points 67, 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13
-N31 : point 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13
-N33 : point 65
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/14
: points 84, 87, 90, 96
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -479/14
-N36 : point 40
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -115/15
: point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -115/15
-N111 : point 83
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
10/05/2017
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 239 from 24.07.2017, p.4
Application: OJ C 178 from 01.06.2015, p.9
Name of the parties
Chavez-Vilchez and Others
Notes on Academic Writings
- Klaasen, M.A.K.: Bij het vaststellen of er een afgeleid verblijfsrecht bestaat voor de ouder van een minderjarige Unieburger moet rekening worden gehouden met het recht op gezinsleven en het belang van het kind, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2017 nº 1566-1568 (NL)
- Schrauwen, A.A.M.: Uitspraak Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie, 10 mei 2017, zaak C-133/15, Chavez-Vilchez e.a. / Raad van bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank e.a., Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2017 p.173-180 (NL)
- Monéger, Françoise: Le droit au séjour et aux prestations familiales des parents d'enfants citoyens européens, ressortissants d'États tiers, Revue de droit sanitaire et social 2017 p.671-677 (FR)
- Leboeuf, Luc: Arrêt « Chavez-Vilchez » : la nécessaire démonstration du lien de dépendance entre l’enfant mineur citoyen européen et son parent ressortissant de pays tiers, Journal de droit européen 2017 nº 242 p.321-322 (FR)
- Rigaux, Anne: Regroupement familial, Europe 2017 Juillet Comm. nº 255 p.25-26 (FR)
- Kroeze, H.: Belang van het kind staat centraal in de toepassing van Ruiz Zambrano, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2017 p.483-485 (NL)
- Pfersich, Andreas: Ausweisung eines Flüchtlings wegen Unterstützung der PKK, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2017 p.459-469 (DE)
- Di Comite, Valeria: Derecho de residencia de los progenitores nacionales de terceros Estados e interés superior del niño "europeo". Comentario a la Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Gran Sala) de 10 de mayo de 2017 en el asunto Chávez-Vílchez, Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 2017 nº 58 p.1041-1058 (ES)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.95-110 (FR)
- Staiano, Fulvia: Derivative residence rights for parents of Union citizen children under Article 20 TFEU: Chavez-Vilchez', Common Market Law Review 2018 p.225–241 (EN)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Renaudière, Géraldine: Libre circulation des personnes dans l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.141-151 (FR)
- Peyrl, Johannes: Kinderbetreuungsgeld für Drittstaatsangehörige, die aus der "Kernbestandsdoktrin" des EuGH ein Aufenthaltsrecht ableiten können, Das Recht der Arbeit 2018 p.234-236 (DE)
- Van Eijken, Hanneke ; Phoa, Pauline: Ths scope of article 20 TFEU clarified in Chavez-Vilchez : are the fundamental rights of minor EU citizens coming of age ?, European Law Review 2018 Vol.43, N°6 p.949-970 (EN)
- Benlolo Carabot, Myriam: VI. Citoyenneté - Cour de justice, gde ch., 10 mai 2017, H. C. Chavez-Vilchez, aff. C-133/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:354, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 251-254 (FR)
- Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Renaudière, Géraldine: Libre circulation des personnes dans l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2019 p.166-175 (FR)
- Linden, Hanna van der ; Wilde, A.F. Dylano de: Chavez-Vilchez heeft alleen gevolgen voor Nederland en Verenigd Koninkrijk, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2020 p.226-228 (NL)
- Besselsen, Elles A. ; Besten, Mirjam J. den: Vier jaar na Chavez-Vilchez : weinig perspectief op permanent verblijf in Nederland : C-133/15, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2021 nº 9 p. 464-472 (NL)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Rosas
Advocate General
Szpunar
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion