Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 14 November 2012

Nexans France SAS and Nexans SA v European Commission

Competition — Administrative procedure — Action for annulment — Acts adopted during an inspection — Intermediate measures — Inadmissibility — Decision ordering an inspection — Duty to state reasons — Protection of privacy — Reasonable grounds — Review by the Courts

Case T‑135/09



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
07/12/2012 Nexans France and Nexans v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2012:596
14/11/2012 Nexans France and Nexans v Commission
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:T:2012:596
14/11/2012 Nexans France and Nexans v Commission
Application (OJ)
20/06/2009 Nexans France and Nexans v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 92/1 of 9 January 2009 ordering Nexans SA and all companies directly or indirectly controlled by it, including Nexans France, to submit to an inspection in accordance with Article 20(4) of Council Regulation No 1/2003 adopted in the context of a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC concerning the European market for electric cable and related equipment (Case COMP/39.610-Surge)

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.01 Parties, legal representation, legal aid
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
      3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.00 General


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 07/04/2009

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/11/2012


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 141 from 20.06.2009, p.48

Judgment: OJ C 399 from 22.12.2012, p.16

Name of the parties

Nexans France and Nexans v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Picod, Fabrice: Annulation partielle d'une décision d'inspection, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2012 nº 48 p.2154 (FR)
  2. Idot, Laurence: Déroulement des inspections sur décision, Europe 2013 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.39-40 (FR)
  3. Laghezza, Angela: From the Nexans judgment to the "next" improvements of the EU dawn raid procedure?, European Competition Law Review 2013 p.214-217 (EN)
  4. Probst, Julie ; Lutz, Fabian: La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice et du Tribunal de l'Union européenne. Chronique des arrêts. Arrêt « Nexans », Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2013 nº 1 p.192-198 (FR)
  5. Puel, Frédéric: Nexans: Some Limitations to Inspections Carried Out by the European Commission in the Context of Investigations, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2013 Vol. 4 nº 4 p.312-314 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : application granted
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Kanninen

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available