Reports of Cases

2011 II-01157

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 266 : paragraph 57
• Decision 2007/691 : paragraphs 35 - 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/59 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -37/71 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/97 : paragraphs 40 - 42
• General Court - Judgment T -99/04 : paragraph 53
• General Court - Judgment T -386/06 : paragraphs 35 - 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -510/06 : paragraph 53

Operative part

• Modifies : Decision 2007/691 -A01

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 15/12/2006

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

24/03/2011

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 42 from 24.02.2007, p.30

Judgment: OJ C 145 from 14.05.2011, p.21

Name of the parties

Tomkins v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Idot, Laurence: Cartels et participation à une entente globale, Europe 2011 Mai 2011 Comm. nº 5 p.33-34 (FR)
2. Sarrazin, Cyril: Infraction continue - Imputabilité : Le Tribunal de l’UE annule une partie des amendes prononcées dans le cartel des raccords en cuivre (Viega, Legris Industries, Comap, IMI, Kaimer, FRA.BO, Tomkins, IBP, Aalberts Industries, Pegler), Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2011 nº 2 p.98-100 (FR)
3. Cardonnel, Pascal: Ententes - Preuve de la participation à l’entente : Le Tribunal de l’UE précise les exigences en matière de preuve de l’infraction à l’article 101 TFUE (Viega, Legris Industries, Comap, IMI, Kaimer, FRA.BO, Tomkins, IBP, Aalberts Industries, Pegler c/ Commission), Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2011 nº 2 p.186-187 (FR)
4. Lavoie, Chantal: The "Copper Fittings" Judgments: Focus on Single Continuous Infringement and on Parent-Subsidiary Relationship - T-375/06, Viega GmbH & Co. KG v Commission, T-376/06, Legris Industries SA v Commission, T-377/06, Comap SA v Commission, T-378/06, IMI & Others v Commission, T-379/06, Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG & Others v Commission, T-381/06, FRA.BO SpA v Commission, T-382/06, Tomkins plc v Commission, T-384/06, IBP Ltd & International Building Products France SA v Commission, T-385/06, Aalberts Industries NV & Others v Commission, T-386/06, Pegler Ltd v Commission, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2011 Vol. 2 nº 5 p.468-471 (EN)
5. Nijs, B.A.: Tomkins-arrest: in hoeverre kan een moederonderneming profiteren van een succesvol beroep van de dochter?, Actualiteiten mededingingsrecht 2011 p.130-131 (NL)
6. Van Huffel, Michel: De l’importance de bien rédiger ses conclusions dans les affaires qui concernent la mère et la fille..., Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2011 nº 28 p.71-72 (FR)
7. Bernardeau, Ludovic: Like mother, like daughter, (sauf) en droit de la concurrence ?, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2015 nº 42 p.74-82 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Actions for annulment : application granted
  
• Appeal brought against a sanction : application granted
  

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Wahl

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available