Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 16 June 2008 refusing to grant the applicant access to the administrative file of a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA (Case COMP/F/38.899 – Gas insulated switchgear) concerning a cartel in the industry for gas insulated switchgear projects
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.01 Principles
2.03.02.01.03 Concrete, individual examination of the documents
2.03.02.01.03.01 Obligation to carry out a concrete, individual examination
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.01 Scope
2.03.01.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.01 Principles
2.03.02.01.03 Concrete, individual examination of the documents
2.03.02.01.03.02 Exceptions to the obligation to carry out a concrete, individual examination
2.03.02.01.03.02.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.03 Relative exceptions
2.03.02.03.05 Protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits
2.03.02.03.05.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.01 Principles
2.03.02.01.03 Concrete, individual examination of the documents
2.03.02.01.03.02 Exceptions to the obligation to carry out a concrete, individual examination
2.03.02.01.03.02.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.01 Principles
2.03.02.01.03 Concrete, individual examination of the documents
2.03.02.01.03.02 Exceptions to the obligation to carry out a concrete, individual examination
2.03.02.01.03.02.01 Applications for access that are particularly burdensome
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.03 Relative exceptions
2.03.02.03.05 Protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits
2.03.02.03.05.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.03 Relative exceptions
2.03.02.03.05 Protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits
2.03.02.03.05.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.03 Relative exceptions
2.03.02.03.03 Protection of commercial interests
|
|
|
2.03.01.04.02.01 Right of access to the Commission's competition or State aid file
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.01 Scope
2.03.01.04 Relationship with specific rights of access
2.03.01.04.02 Privileged rights of access
2.03.01.04.02.01 Right of access to the Commission's competition or State aid file
|
|
|
4.08.03.02.06 Hearing of persons concerned and of third parties / Access to the file
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
4.08.03.02.06 Hearing of persons concerned and of third parties / Access to the file
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.03 Right of public access to documents
2.03.02 Exceptions
2.03.02.03 Relative exceptions
2.03.02.03.06 Protection of the decision-making process
2.03.02.03.06.02 Completed procedure
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraphs 60, 77, 116, 145
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82
: paragraphs 60, 145
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 255
-P2 : paragraph 39
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A40L4 : paragraph 27
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A53 : paragraph 27
-
General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A116P3 : paragraph 27
-
Regulation 659/1999
: paragraphs 56, 59
-
Regulation 1049/2001
: paragraphs 28, 36, 39, 56, 57, 97, 101, 104, 125 - 127, 138, 142, 145
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A01 : paragraph 39
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04 : paragraphs 29, 39, 41, 46, 54, 55, 61, 126, 145, 166
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P2 : paragraphs 40, 66
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P2T1 : paragraphs 38, 80, 110, 133 - 135, 138, 174
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P2T3 : paragraphs 30, 38, 61, 62, 110, 115, 116, 120, 129, 172, 173
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P3 : paragraph 152
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P3L1 : paragraphs 152, 155, 158, 167
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P3L2 : paragraphs 38, 86, 87, 90, 91, 110, 152 - 163, 166 - 169, 175
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A04P6 : paragraph 65
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A07P3 : paragraph 101
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-A08P2 : paragraphs 101, 104
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-C11 : paragraph 39
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-C2 : paragraph 39
-
Regulation 1049/2001
-C4 : paragraphs 39, 126
-
Regulation 1/2003
: paragraphs 58, 59, 60, 70
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A18 : paragraph 73
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A20P2LC : paragraph 77
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A27 : paragraph 59
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A27P2 : paragraphs 145, 146
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A28 : paragraph 77
-
Regulation 773/2004
: paragraph 60
-
Regulation 773/2004
-A08P2 : paragraph 60
-
Regulation 773/2004
-A15P4 : paragraph 60
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52005XC1222(03)
: paragraph 138
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52005XC1222(03)
-PT2 : paragraph 138
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52005XC1222(03)
-PT23 : paragraphs 137 - 139, 141
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/59
: paragraph 27
-
General Court - Judgment T -61/89
: paragraph 50
-
General Court - Order T -1/89
: paragraphs 139, 141
-
General Court - Judgment T -295/94
: paragraph 50
-
General Court - Judgment T -305/94
: paragraph 59
-
General Court - Judgment T -374/94
: paragraph 50
-
General Court - Order T -134/94
: paragraphs 139, 141
-
General Court - Judgment T -14/98
: paragraphs 94, 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -248/99
: paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99
: paragraphs 128, 148
-
General Court - Judgment T -20/99
: paragraph 116
-
General Court - Judgment T -211/00
: paragraph 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -109/02
: paragraph 59
-
General Court - Judgment T -119/02
: paragraph 27
-
General Court - Judgment T -2/03
: paragraphs 28, 45, 47, 65, 94, 95, 100 - 103, 105, 106, 108
-
General Court - Judgment T -391/03
: paragraphs 116, 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04
: paragraph 148
-
General Court - Judgment T -36/04
: paragraphs 116, 121
-
General Court - Judgment T -380/04
: paragraph 134
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/05
: paragraphs 40, 41, 45, 55, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/05
: paragraphs 41, 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/05
: paragraphs 41, 126
-
General Court - Judgment T -144/05
: paragraphs 162, 163
-
General Court - Judgment T -237/05
: paragraph 157
-
General Court - Judgment T -403/05
: paragraph 157
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -139/07
: paragraphs 40, 45, 55 - 58, 61, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/07
: paragraphs 40, 45, 55, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/08
: paragraphs 154, 157, 158, 167
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
22/05/2012
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 272 from 25.10.2008, p.42
Judgment: OJ C 194 from 30.06.2012, p.18
Name of the parties
EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Kapp, Thomas: "Spannungsverhältnis zwischen nationaler und europäischer Entscheidungspraxis zum Akteneinsichtsrecht bedarf der Klärung", Betriebs-Berater 2012 p.1695-1696 (DE)
- Idot, Laurence: Actions en réparation et accès au dossier de la Commission, Europe 2012 Mai Comm. nº 7 p.280 (FR)
- Cardonnel, Pascal: Accès au dossier - R. 1049/2001 : Le Tribunal de l’UE annule le refus de la Commission de divulguer les pièces de son dossier à une victime du cartel des appareillages de commutation à isolation gazeuse (EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg), Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2012 nº 3 p.188-190 (FR)
- Girgenson, Ianis: Une nouvelle défaite de la Commission en matière de transparence, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2012 nº 32 p.95-96 (FR)
- Palzer, Christoph: Stolperstein für die Kommission? Die Kronzeugenregelung auf dem Prüfstand der Transparenz-VO, Europarecht 2012 p.583-607 (DE)
- Azoulai, Loïc ; Coutts, Stephen: Restricting Union citizen's residence rights on grounds of public security. Where Union citizenship and the AFSJ meet: P.I., Common Market Law Review 2013 p.553-570 (EN)
- Yomere, Anika: Die Entscheidung im Verfahren EnBW zum Recht von Schadensersatzklägern auf Akteneinsicht in Verfahrensakten der Kommission, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 2013 p.34-40 (DE)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Provisions governing the institutions
- Competition
- - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
- - Access to documents
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : application granted
Formation of the Court
quatrième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Pelikánová
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available