Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013

Team Relocations NV and Others v European Commission

Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — International removal services market in Belgium — Direct and indirect price-fixing, market-sharing and manipulation of the procedures for the submission of tenders — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability — Guidelines on the method of setting fines (2006) — Value of sales — Concept — Proportion — Additional amount — Mitigating circumstances — Obligation to state reasons — Imputability to the parent company of the infringement — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Ceiling of 10% of turnover — Proportionality

Case C‑444/11 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Order
ECLI:EU:C:2013:656
03/10/2013 Team Relocations and Others v Commission
Judgment (OJ)
09/08/2013 Team Relocations and Others v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2013:464
11/07/2013 Team Relocations and Others v Commission
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:C:2013:464
11/07/2013 Team Relocations and Others v Commission
Application (OJ)
11/11/2011 Team Relocations and Others v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-204/08 and T-212/08 Team Relocations NV and Others v Commission, by which that Court dismissed an action for the partial annulment of Commission decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 – International Removal Services), concerning a cartel on the Belgian international removal services market, relating to the direct or indirect fixing of prices, market sharing and the manipulation of the procedure for the submission of tenders, and for the annulment or, in the alternative, the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.02 Issues relating to the admissibility of the pleas
        3.10.03.02.01 Challenging the decision under appeal
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
      4.08.01.03 Exemption from the prohibition
        4.08.01.03.01 Conditions for exemption
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.02 Jurisdiction over the appeal
      3.10.02.01 Exclusion of questions of fact
        3.10.02.01.01 Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence
          3.10.02.01.01.00 General
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.04 Substance of the pleas in law
        3.10.03.04.03 Infringement of EU law
          3.10.03.04.03.01 Insufficient or contradictory reasoning for the decision under appeal
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
        4.08.03.03.04 Fines for infringement of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (Articles 81 EC and 82 EC)
          4.08.03.03.04.02 Basic amount
            4.08.03.03.04.02.01 Basic amount according to the 2006 Guidelines
              4.08.03.03.04.02.01.01 Value of sales
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.07 Interpretation of EU law
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.02 Issues relating to the admissibility of the pleas
        3.10.03.02.06 Pleas in law challenging decisions delivered in the exercise of unlimited jurisdiction
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
        4.08.03.03.04 Fines for infringement of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (Articles 81 EC and 82 EC)
          4.08.03.03.04.02 Basic amount
            4.08.03.03.04.02.02 Basic amount according to the 1998 Guidelines
              4.08.03.03.04.02.02.01 General starting amount
                4.08.03.03.04.02.02.01.00 General
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.03 Ineffective pleas in law
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
    2.05.06 Statement of reasons
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
      3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.00 EU competition rules
      4.08.00.06 Definition of undertaking
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.08 Competition
    4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
        4.08.03.03.04 Fines for infringement of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (Articles 81 EC and 82 EC)
          4.08.03.03.04.03 Adjustment to the basic amount
            4.08.03.03.04.03.05 Maximum amount
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.20 Equality before the law


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 26/08/2011

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

11/07/2013


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 347 from 26.11.2011, p.9

Judgment: OJ C 252 from 31.08.2013, p.9

Name of the parties

Team Relocations and Others v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Idot, Laurence: Cartels, notion d'entreprise et valeur des lignes directrices. La Cour apporte d'importantes précisions sur l'utilisation de la notion d'entreprise à des fins de détermination des responsabilités et confirme la portée tant des lignes directrices relatives à l'affectation du commerce entre États membres que de celles relatives au calcul des sanctions de 2006, Europe 2013 Octobre Comm. nº 10 p.31-32 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Action for damages
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jarašiūnas

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available