Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 May 2011 in Case T-1/08 Buczek Automotive v Commission by which the General Court partially annulled Commission Decision 2008/344/EC of 23 October 2007 on State Aid C 23/06 (ex NN 35/06) which Poland has implemented for steel producer Technologie Buczek Group (OJ 2008 L 116, p. 26) – Classification as State aid of the failure to request the liquidation of the debtor undertaking – Error of law in the assessment of the Commission’s application of the hypothetical private creditor test and in the allocation of the burden of proof
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3.10.02 Jurisdiction over the appeal
|
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.02 Jurisdiction over the appeal
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.01 Private investor/private creditor test
4.09.01.03.01.04 Recovery of debts
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.01 Private investor/private creditor test
4.09.01.03.01.04 Recovery of debts
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
3.10.03.03 Ineffective pleas in law
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 87
-P1 : paragraph 29
-
TFEU, Article 107
: paragraph 31
-
TFEU, Article 107
-P1 : paragraph 46
-
Decision 2008/344
: paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Decision 2008/344
-A01 : paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Decision 2008/344
-A03 : paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Decision 2008/344
-A03P3 : paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Decision 2008/344
-A04 : paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Decision 2008/344
-A05 : paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -19/93
: paragraph 15
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/96
: paragraphs 32, 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/97
: paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/97
: paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/97
: paragraphs 32, 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -174/99
: paragraph 15
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -164/01
: paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/02
: paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -525/04
: paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -290/07
: paragraphs 49, 50
-
General Court - Judgment T -1/08
: paragraphs 1 - 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10
: paragraphs 31 - 33, 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/11
: paragraphs 31, 32, 46 - 50, 54, 59
-
Court of Justice - Order C -649/11
: paragraph 65
Operative part
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
21/03/2013
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 311 from 22.10.2011, p.19
Judgment: OJ C 156 from 01.06.2013, p.8
Name of the parties
Commission v Buczek Automotive
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Créancier privé en économie de marché. La charge de la preuve des conditions d'application du critère du créancier privé en économie de marché pèse sur la Commission, Europe 2013 Mai Comm. nº 5 p.29 (FR)
- Muguet-Poullennec, Gwenaël: Critère du créancier privé et contrôle juridictionnel (suites des arrêts EDF et Frucona Koice), Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2013 nº 36 p.62-63 (FR)
- Vallery, Anne ; Wiame, Hannelore: The Private Creditor Test: Anythin New under the Sun?, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2014 p.528-537 (EN)
- Idot, Laurence: Remises fiscales dans le cadre d'un concordat et critère du créancier privé, Europe 2017 novembre nº 11 p.42 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment
- Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
sixième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Arabadjiev
Advocate General
Mengozzi
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available