Judgment of the Court of 16 June 1998.

A. Racke GmbH & Co. v Hauptzollamt Mainz.

Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany.

EEC/Yugoslavia Cooperation Agreement - Suspension of trade concessions - Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties - Rebus sic stantibus clause.

Case C-162/96.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:1998:293
16/06/1998 Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:1998:293
16/06/1998 Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:1997:582
04/12/1997 Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

1998 I-03655

Subject-matter

Request for a preliminary ruling ─ Bundesfinanzhof ─ Validity of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3300/91 of 11 November 1991 suspending the trade concessions provided for by the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (OJ 1991 L 315, p. 1)

Systematic classification scheme

1.
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-19 Legal proceedings
    B-19.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
      B-19.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-25 International agreements
    B-25.04 Effects. Scope and limits
A The Community legal order
  A-04 Community law and international law
    A-04.00 General
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-19 Legal proceedings
    B-19.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
      B-19.04.03 Effects of a preliminary ruling
        B-19.04.03.02 Effects of judgments determining validity
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-25 International agreements
    B-25.04 Effects. Scope and limits
A The Community legal order
  A-04 Community law and international law
    A-04.00 General
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-25 International agreements
    B-25.04 Effects. Scope and limits


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 13/05/1996

Date of the Opinion

  • 04/12/1997

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

16/06/1998


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 197 from 06.07.1996, p.13

Judgment: OJ C 258 from 15.08.1998, p.9

Name of the parties

Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Aschenbrenner, Gerhard: Anfechtbarkeit von Gemeinschaftsakten bei Verletzung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht, European Law Reporter 1998 p.405
  2. Rigaux, Anne ; Simon, Denys: Europe 1998 Août-Septembre Comm. nº 265 p.7-8
  3. Hoffmeister, Frank: Die Bindung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft an das Völkergewohnheitsrecht der Verträge, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 1998 p.365-371
  4. Castillo de la Torre, Fernando: Derecho comunitario, Derecho de los tratados y sanciones económicas (Comentario a la Sentencia del TJCE de 16 de junio de 1998, Racke, C-162/96), Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 1998 p.549-572
  5. Roldán Barbero, Javier: La costumbre internacional, la cláusula rebus sic stantibus y el Derecho comunitario (A propósito de la sentencia Racke dictada por el TJCE el 16.6.98), Revista española de Derecho Internacional 1998 p.9-34
  6. Epiney, Astrid: Zur Stellung des Völkerrechts in der EU, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1999 p.5-11
  7. Leray, Emmanuelle: L'intégration du droit international coutumier dans l'ordre juridique communautaire, La Semaine juridique - édition générale 1999 II 10022
  8. Kuyper, P.J.: S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 1999 p.65-67
  9. Kokott, Juliane ; Hoffmeister, Frank: American Journal of International Law 1999 p.205-209
  10. Klabbers, Jan: Common Market Law Review 1999 p.179-189
  11. Mastroianni, Roberto: La rilevanza delle norme consuetudinarie sulla sospensione dei trattati nell'ordinamento comunitario: la sentenza Racke, Rivista di diritto internazionale 1999 p.86-105
  12. Petit, Yves: La Cour de justice des Communautés européennes et les rapports droit international / droit communautaire. (à propos de l'arrêt du 16 juin 1998, Racke), Recueil Dalloz Sirey 1999 Chr. p.184-188
  13. Gagliardi, Andrea Filippo: The right of individuals to invoke the provisions of mixed agreements before the national courts: a new message from Luxembourg?, European Law Review 1999 p.276-292
  14. Mehdi, Rostane: Chronique de jurisprudence du Tribunal et de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes, Journal du droit international 1999 p.527-530
  15. X: Giustizia civile 1999 I p.1908-1909
  16. Furlan, Simonetta: L'utilizzazione del mutamento di circostanze a fini sanzionatori da parte della Comunità: riflessioni in margine alla sentenza "Racke", Il Diritto dell'Unione Europea 1999 p.315-335
  17. Tserkezis, Giorgos: Armenopoulos 1999 p.1624-1626
  18. Berramdane, Abdelkhaleq: L'application de la coutume internationale dans l'ordre juridique communautaire, Cahiers de droit européen 2000 p.253-279
  19. Gadbin, Daniel: Chronique de jurisprudence communautaire. (année 1998), Revue de droit rural 2000 p.478-480



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesfinanzhof - Germany

Subject-matter

  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Kapteyn

Advocate General

Jacobs

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English