Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Reports of Staff Cases - 'Civil Service Tribunal' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 84/450 : paragraph 19
• Directive 2005/29 : paragraphs 17, 30, 37
• Directive 2005/29 -A06 : paragraphs 5, 28
• Directive 2005/29 -A07 : paragraphs 1, 6, 28
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P1 : paragraphs 18, 29, 30, 35, 37, 40
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P2 : paragraphs 18, 29, 30, 35, 37, 40
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P3 : paragraphs 37, 40
• Directive 2006/114 : paragraphs 19, 20
• Directive 2006/114 -A02LB : paragraphs 3, 28
• Directive 2006/114 -A03 : paragraph 31
• Directive 2006/114 -A04 : paragraphs 4, 22, 23
• Directive 2006/114 -A04LA : paragraphs 1, 17, 18, 28, 29, 34, 36, 40
• Directive 2006/114 -A04LC : paragraphs 1, 17, 18, 25, 36, 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/99 -N36 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/99 -N37 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/01 -N44 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N22 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N45 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N20 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N21 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N22 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N46 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N47 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N48 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N51 : paragraph 31

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P1
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P2
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P3
• Interprets : Directive 2006/114 -A04LA
• Interprets : Directive 2006/114 -A04LC

Opinion

• Directive 84/450 : points 23, 24
  
• Directive 84/450 -A03BIS : points 27, 28
  
• Directive 84/450 -A03BISP1LC : point 48
  
• Directive 2005/29 : points 16, 55, 60, 61, 65, 67, 81
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A02LI : points 59, 62
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A02LK : point 38
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A03P1 : point 55
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A04LA : point 77
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A05 : point 39
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A06 : points 37, 39, 55
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A06P1LD : point 6
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07 : points 37, 39, 55, 59, 68 - 71, 75, 80, 81
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P1 : points 7, 38, 63 - 66, 77
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P2 : points 7, 66, 73
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P3 : point 77
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P4LA : point 59
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P4LE : point 59
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P5 : point 65
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A08 : point 39
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A09 : point 39
  
• Directive 2005/29 -A13 : point 66
  
• Directive 2006/114 : points 23 - 26, 55, 77
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A02LB : points 4, 37
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A02LC : point 22
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A03 : point 40
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A04 : points 1, 22, 27, 28
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A04LA : points 1, 5, 16 - 39, 45, 46, 52, 55, 66, 81
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A04LB : points 26, 29
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A04LC : points 1, 5, 16 - 28, 32 - 36, 47, 50, 54, 57, 81
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A04LH : point 52
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A08 : point 29
  
• Directive 2006/114 -A10 : point 23
  
• Directive 2006/114 -C1 : points 23, 24
  
• Directive 2006/114 -C6 : point 27
  
• Directive 2006/114 -C8 : point 27
  
• Directive 2006/114 -C9 : points 27, 48
  
• Directive 2006/114 -C11 : point 22
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52003PC0356 : point 65
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52006PC0222 -PT4 : point 24
  
• Commission - SEC Document - 52016SC0163 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/99 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/99 -N37 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/01 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/01 -N44 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/01 -N65 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N24 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N25 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N26 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N27 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N28 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N29 : points 26, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N30 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N31 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N32 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N33 : points 26, 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N34 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N35 : points 26, 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N36 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N37 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N38 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N39 : points 26, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N43 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N44 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N45 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N46 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N68 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N70 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N83 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N84 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/04 -N85 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -59/05 -N22 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N14 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N15 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N16 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N17 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N18 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N19 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N20 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N21 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N22 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N23 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/05 -N24 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N20 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N21 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N22 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N25 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N26 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N27 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N28 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N29 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N30 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N31 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N32 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N33 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N34 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N35 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N36 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N37 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N38 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N39 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N40 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N46 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N47 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N48 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N50 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/09 -N56 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 : point 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N50 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N51 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N52 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N53 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N54 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N55 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N56 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N57 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N58 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N59 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/12 -N36 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/13 -N22 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/13 -N27 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -13/15 -N38 : point 39
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 04/11/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 19/10/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

08/02/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 104 from 03.04.2017, p.19

Application: OJ C 27 from 25.01.2016, p.11

Name of the parties

Carrefour Hypermarchés

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Lettner, Harald ; Schiller, Sandra: Vergleichende Werbung, European Law Reporter 2016 p.291-295 (DE)
2. Mairal Montero de Espinosa, Sofia: The Place to Be: Material Information in Comparative Advertising, European Law Reporter 2016 p.295-298 (DE, EN)
3. Sonnberger, Marcus W. A.: Wettbewerbsrecht Zur Beurteilung elner vergleichenden Werbung, Wirtschaftsrechtliche Blätter 2017 p.146-148 (DE)
4. Rigaux, Anne: Publicité comparative, Europe 2017 Avril nº 04 p.32-33 (FR)
5. Brauneck, Jens: EuGH: Neues Tatbestandsmerkmal der Geschäftsgrößenangabe bei vergleichender Werbung?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht INT 2017 p.409-416 (DE)
6. Eckel, Philipp: Lauterkeitsrecht: Werbung mit Preisvergleichen zwischen Geschäften unterschiedlicher Größe, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2017 p.262-263 (DE)
7. Kuchar, Barbara: Irreführender Preisvergleich - Neues vom EuGH, Ecolex 2017 p.340-342 (DE)
8. Horak, Michael: Vergleichende Preiswerbung, Ecolex 2017 p.346 (DE)
9. Adobati, Enrica: La Corte di giustizia interpreta la direttiva sulla pubblicità comparativa nell'ambito di un confronto di prezzi di prodotti venduti in negozi diversi quanto a dimensioni o tipologia, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2017 p.122-125 (IT)
10. Hoogenraad, E.H. ; Duivenvoorde, B.B.: Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2017 p.334-336 (NL)
11. Soņeca, Viktorija ; Petrocka-Petrovska, Elīza: Eiropas Savienības tiesa : aktualitātes judikatūrā, Jurista vārds 2017 50 p.28-32 (LV)
12. Dorkó, Dalma: Az árak tárgyilagos összehasonlítása és megtévesztő mulasztás összehasonlító reklámok esetén - A Carrefour-ítélet, Versenytükör 2017 1. szám p.59-64 (HU)
13. Vandenbulcke, Joyce: Carrefour versus Intermarché(super):een oneerlijke strijd?, Marktpraktijken: intellectuele eigendom mededinging: jaarboek (Ed. Kluwer ) 2017 p.52-65 (NL)
14. Allaerts, Margo ; Burki, Victor: Vermeldingen in de initiële reclame ontnemen het kunstmatige karakter aan een asymmetrische vergelijking, Droit de la consommation 2018 N° 119 p.49 - 60 (NL)
15. Arcelin, Linda: Arrêt Carrefour Hypermarchés : comparaison entre enseignes de tailles différentes : manque d'objectivité et (ou ?) tromperie ?, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation 2019 N°2016/3 p.523-529 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Cour d'appel de Paris - France

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Consumer protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Code de la consommation, art. L. 121-8 et L. 121-12

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jarašiūnas

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

• French
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French