Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 29
• Directive 93/13 : paragraphs 1, 25, 35 - 54, 60, 68
• Directive 93/13 -A01P1 : paragraph 4
• Directive 93/13 -A01P2 : paragraph 69
• Directive 93/13 -A03 : paragraph 5
• Directive 93/13 -A03P1 : paragraphs 55 - 58, 67, 73
• Directive 93/13 -A04 : paragraphs 6, 25, 55, 67
• Directive 93/13 -A04P1 : paragraph 61
• Directive 93/13 -A04P2 : paragraphs 62, 64, 67
• Directive 93/13 -A06 : paragraphs 35, 36, 54
• Directive 93/13 -A06P1 : paragraphs 7, 25, 41, 51, 71
• Directive 93/13 -A07 : paragraphs 35, 36, 54, 73
• Directive 93/13 -A07P1 : paragraphs 8, 25, 52, 72
• Directive 93/13 -C16 : paragraph 3
• Directive 93/13 -C24 : paragraphs 3, 72
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A105P1 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/99 -N18 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N35 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N36 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N37 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N51 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N52 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N53 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -137/08 -N42 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/08 -N39 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/08 -N19 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -618/10 -N65 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -618/10 -N68 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -618/10 -N76 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -618/10 -N77 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N46 : paragraphs 43, 70
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N60 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N66 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N67 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N68 : paragraph 59
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N69 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N71 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N73 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -488/11 -N57 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/13 -N41 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/13 -N41 : paragraph 70
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/13 -N28 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/13 -N30 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Order C -602/13 -N50 : paragraph 73
• Court of Justice - Order C -602/13 -N54 : paragraph 73
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/14 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/14 -N39 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/14 -N22 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/14 -N23 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/14 -N36 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/14 -N50 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Order C -421/14 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/15 -N53 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/15 -N54 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/15 -N55 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/15 -N58 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/15 -N68 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/15 -N71 : paragraph 51

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 93/13
• Interprets : Directive 93/13 -A03P1
• Interprets : Directive 93/13 -A04
• Interprets : Directive 93/13 -A04P2
• Interprets : Directive 93/13 -A06
• Interprets : Directive 93/13 -A07

Opinion

• Directive 93/13 : points 1, 44, 46 - 48, 75, 77, 80, 87
  
• Directive 93/13 -A01P2 : points 76, 79
  
• Directive 93/13 -A03P1 : points 52, 53, 81, 84
  
• Directive 93/13 -A03P3 : point 56
  
• Directive 93/13 -A04 : points 5, 24, 50, 74, 88
  
• Directive 93/13 -A04P1 : points 51, 56, 62, 67, 69
  
• Directive 93/13 -A04P2 : points 51, 59 - 61, 64, 71
  
• Directive 93/13 -A06 : points 3, 33, 38, 42, 49, 88
  
• Directive 93/13 -A06P1 : points 6, 24, 45, 86
  
• Directive 93/13 -A07 : points 3, 33, 38, 42, 49, 84, 88
  
• Directive 93/13 -A07P1 : points 7, 24
  
• Directive 93/13 -A08 : point 64
  
• Directive 93/13 -C13 : point 76
  
• Directive 93/13 -C16 : point 55
  
• Directive 93/13 -C19 : points 4, 72
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A105P1 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -240/98 -N25 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -240/98 -N29 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/05 -N36 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/05 -N38 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/08 -N30 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/08 -N32 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -484/08 -N42 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -484/08 -N43 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/10 -N22 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/10 -N25 : point 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/10 -N30 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -618/10 -N71 : point 86
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -415/11 -N66 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -415/11 -N71 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -415/11 -N74 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/11 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 : points 36, 40, 65, 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N34 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N44 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N46 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N66 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N68 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N69 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N70 : point 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/11 -N71 : point 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/11 -N22 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/11 -N23 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -537/12 -N39 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -537/12 -N41 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -537/12 -N66 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/13 -N83 : point 86
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/13 -N32 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/13 -N42 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -602/13 -N45 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -602/13 -N50 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -8/14 : points 34, 40
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -8/14 -N30 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -8/14 -N31 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -8/14 -N32 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -8/14 -N33 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -49/14 -N72 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -49/14 -N73 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -49/14 -N74 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/14 : points 34, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/14 -N22 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/14 -N36 : point 46
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 10/09/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 02/02/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/01/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 104 from 03.04.2017, p.9

Application: OJ C 421 from 24.11.2014, p.19

Name of the parties

Banco Primus

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Daniel, Élise: Clauses abusives, Europe 2017 Mars nº 03 p.27-28 (FR)
2. Hartkamp, A.S.: Oneerlijke contractsbedingen in verband met hypothecaire uitwinning en gezag van gewijsde, Ars aequi 2017 p.827-832 (NL)
3. Luzak, Joasia: Ook over u wordt geoordeeld: erga omnes effect van geregistreerde oneerlijke bedingen in Polen, Droit de la consommation 2017 p.68-78 (NL)
4. Piekenbrock, Andreas: Rechtsschutz in der Hypothekarvollstreckung und unionsrechtliche Klauselkontrolle, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2017 p.299-301 (DE)
5. Surdyk, Michał: Kontrola abuzywności postanowień umownych a powaga rzeczy osądzonej, Prawo Europejskie w praktyce 2018 Nr 1-2 p.35-39 (PL)
6. Poillot, Élise: XIX. Consommation - Cour de justice, 1ère ch., 26 janvier 2017, Banco Primus SA c/ Jesús Gutiérrez García, aff. C-421/14, ECLI:EU:C:2017:60, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 828-831 (FR)
7. Péglion-Zika, Claire-Marie: Une nouvelle application de la réglementation européenne contre les clauses abusives en matière de prêts hypothécaires espagnols, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation 2019 N°2016/3 p.499-508 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Juzgado de Primera Instancia nº 2 de Santander - Spain

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Consumer protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Ley 1/2013, de 14 de mayo, de medidas para reforzar la protección a los deudores hipotecarios, reestructuración de deuda y alquiler social, deuxième disposition transitoire Ley 1/2000, de 7 de enero, de Enjuiciamiento Civil (LEC), articles 693, paragraphe 2, et 695 Código Civil, article 1124

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rodin

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• Spanish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French