Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010.

Evropaïki Dynamiki - Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).

Public service contracts - EMCDDA tender procedure - Supply of software programming and consultancy services - Rejection of a submitted tender - Award criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Equal treatment - Transparency - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons.

Case T-63/06.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
23/10/2010 Evropaïki Dynamiki v OEDT
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2010:368		 09/09/2010 Evropaïki Dynamiki v OEDT
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2010:368		 09/09/2010 Evropaïki Dynamiki v OEDT
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
08/04/2006 Evropaïki Dynamiki v OEDT
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2010 II-00177*

Pub somm

Subject-matter

Firstly, annulment of the decision of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) of 5 December 2005 rejecting the applicant's tender submitted in connection with a call for tenders for software programming and consultancy services (OJ 2005 S 187 – 183846), as well as annulment of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and secondly, a claim for damages

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
      2.08.01.01 Equal treatment and transparency
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.05 Choice of participants
        2.08.03.05.01 Selection criteria
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.07 Award of contract
        2.08.03.07.01 Award criteria
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.04 Subject-matter, form of order sought and pleas in law
      3.08.04.01 Formal requirements
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.05 Judicial review
      2.08.05.01 Extent of judicial review
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
      2.08.01.01 Equal treatment and transparency
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
      2.08.01.03 Good administration
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.04 Submission of tenders
        2.08.03.04.02 Verification by the contracting authority
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
    2.05.06 Statement of reasons
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
      2.08.01.04 Obligation to state reasons
        2.08.01.04.02 Assessment in concreto


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 16/02/2006

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

09/09/2010


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 86 from 08.04.2006, p.45

Judgment: OJ C 288 from 23.10.2010, p.30

Name of the parties

Evropaïki Dynamiki v OEDT

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • European Union public contracts

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Action for damages : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ciucă

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available