Judgment of the Court of 10 December 2002.

Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union.

International agreements - Convention on Nuclear Safety - Accession decision - Compatibility with the Euratom Treaty - External competence of the Community - Articles 30 to 39 of the Euratom Treaty.

Case C-29/99.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
25/01/2003 Commission v Council
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2002:734
10/12/2002 Commission v Council
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2002:734
10/12/2002 Commission v Council
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2001:680
13/12/2001 Commission v Council
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2002 I-11221

Subject-matter

Application under Article 146 of the EAEC Treaty ─ Partial annulment of the Council decision of 7 December 1998 concerning accession of the European Atomic Energy Community to the Convention on Nuclear Safety

Systematic classification scheme

1.
D European Atomic Energy Community
  D-13 Legal proceedings
    D-13.02 Actions for annulment
D European Atomic Energy Community
  D-13 Legal proceedings
    D-13.02 Actions for annulment
D European Atomic Energy Community
  D-11 External relations
D European Atomic Energy Community
  D-04 Health and safety
D European Atomic Energy Community
  D-04 Health and safety


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 : paragraph 17
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LB : paragraph 76
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LE : paragraph 30
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 30 : paragraphs 18, 19, 80, 89, 97
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 31 : paragraphs 18, 20, 22, 80, 89, 97
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 32 : paragraphs 18, 21, 22, 80, 89, 97
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 33 : paragraphs 18, 80
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 33 -L1 : paragraphs 23, 93, 105
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 33 -L2 : paragraphs 23, 94, 105
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 33 -L3 : paragraphs 23, 105
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 34 : paragraphs 18, 24, 80
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 35 : paragraphs 18, 26, 80, 92
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 35 -L1 : paragraph 25
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 36 : paragraphs 18, 26, 80
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 37 : paragraphs 18, 27, 79, 80, 103
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 38 : paragraphs 18, 80
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 38 -L1 : paragraph 28
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 38 -L2 : paragraph 28
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 39 : paragraphs 18, 29, 80
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 101 -L1 : paragraph 31
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 101 -L2 : paragraphs 31, 67
  • Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 146 : paragraphs 1, 54
  • Regulation 3954/87 : paragraph 80
  • Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A69P2 : paragraph 108
  • Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A69P3L1 : paragraph 108
  • Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A91P1 : paragraph 36
  • Directive 96/29 -C6 : paragraph 81
  • Decision 1999/819 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/74 : paragraph 45
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/87 : paragraph 79
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/88 : paragraph 80
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/93 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/94 : paragraph 45
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/00 : paragraph 54

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 05/02/1999

Date of the Opinion

  • 13/12/2001

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

10/12/2002


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 100 from 10.04.1999, p.9

Judgment: OJ C 19 from 25.01.2003, p.1

Name of the parties

Commission v Council

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Trombetta, Stéphanie: Revue des affaires européennes 2001-02 p.1117-1124
  2. Savy, Daniela: Tendenze evolutive della Corte in tema di competenze della Comunità europea dell'energia atomica in materia di sicurezza nucleare, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2003 p.1037-1040
  3. Koutrakos, Panos: Common Market Law Review 2004 p.191-208



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Provisions governing the institutions
  • Euratom matters
  • - Health and safety
  • Accession

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : application granted
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Colneric

Advocate General

Jacobs

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English