Reports of Cases

2008 I-10053

Subject-matter

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 27 October 2005 in Case T-336/03 Editions Albert René v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which the Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the Community and national word mark "OBELIX" in respect of certain goods and services classed inter alia in Classes 9, 16, 28, 35, 41 and 42 against Decision R 559/2002-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2003 rejecting in part the application brought against the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition proceeding brought against the application to register the word mark MOBILIX in respect of certain goods and services classed in Classes 9, 16, 35, 37, 38 and 42

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : paragraphs 68, 111
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 225 : paragraph 111
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 225 -P1 : paragraph 68
• Directive 89/104 : paragraphs 46, 142
• Directive 89/104 -A04P1LB : paragraph 64
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A135P4 : paragraphs 6, 119 - 127, 144
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A112P1L1LC : paragraph 111
• Regulation 40/94 -A08 : paragraph 2
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P1LB : paragraphs 44 - 46, 62 - 81, 91 - 102, 119
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P2 : paragraph 40
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P5 : paragraphs 119 - 127, 131, 132
• Regulation 40/94 -A61P2 : paragraphs 139 - 140
• Regulation 40/94 -A62P2 : paragraphs 139 - 140
• Regulation 40/94 -A63 : paragraphs 3, 38 - 50, 119 - 127, 131 - 132, 136 - 146
• Regulation 40/94 -A63P2 : paragraphs 38, 123
• Regulation 40/94 -A74 : paragraphs 4, 107 - 113
• Regulation 40/94 -A74P1 : paragraphs 108 - 113
• Regulation 40/94 -A74P2 : paragraphs 141 - 143
• Regulation 40/94 -A76 : paragraphs 5, 139 - 140
• Regulation 40/94 -C7 : paragraph 62
• Regulation 3288/94 : paragraph 2
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/05 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/91 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/92 : paragraph 126
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/95 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -401/96 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/97 : paragraphs 46, 64, 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/97 : paragraph 126
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/97 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/98 : paragraph 111
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/00 : paragraph 110
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/00 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -446/00 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/01 : paragraph 126
• General Court - Judgment T -336/03 : paragraphs 1, 11 - 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/03 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -551/03 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/04 : paragraphs 69, 126
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/04 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/04 : paragraph 98
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -361/04 : paragraph 98
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -416/04 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/05 : paragraphs 68, 110, 111
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/05 : paragraphs 123, 139, 142
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/05 : paragraph 122
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -16/06 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/06 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -171/06 : paragraphs 45, 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/06 : paragraphs 44, 101

Operative part

• Confirms : General Court - Judgment T -336/03

Opinion

• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : points 57, 91
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 225 : point 57
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 225 -P1 : point 91
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 229 : point 84
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 230 : point 84
  
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A135P4 : points 7, 81 - 86, 91 - 100, 105 - 111
  
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A44 : points 5, 91 - 100
  
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A44P1 : points 92 - 93
  
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A48 : points 6, 91 - 100
  
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A48P2 : points 94 - 95
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A38P1 : points 92 - 93
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A42P2L1 : points 94 - 95
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A08 : point 3
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P1 : point 82
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P1LB : points 41, 57 - 65
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P2 : points 41, 82
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P2LC : point 82
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A08P5 : points 81 - 86, 97
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A63 : points 35 - 44, 81 - 86, 91 - 100, 105 - 111
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A63P3 : point 84
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A63P6 : points 97 - 98
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A74 : points 4, 69 - 75
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A74P1 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/76 : points 84, 109
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -125/78 : point 94
  
• General Court - Judgment T -28/90 : point 94
  
• General Court - Judgment T -100/96 : point 95
  
• General Court - Judgment T -331/99 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/99 : point 91
  
• General Court - Judgment T -34/00 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -204/00 : point 39
  
• General Court - Judgment T -129/01 : point 97
  
• General Court - Judgment T -177/03 : point 95
  
• General Court - Judgment T -336/03 : points 1, 14 - 28
  
• General Court - Judgment T -373/03 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -37/03 : point 57
  
• General Court - Order T -366/04 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/04 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/05 : points 71, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/06 : point 59
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 12/01/2006

Date of the Opinion

• 29/11/2007

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

18/12/2008

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 143 from 17.06.2006, p.21

Judgment: OJ C 44 from 21.02.2009, p.2

Name of the parties

Éditions Albert René v OHIM

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  
• - Trade marks
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment
  
• Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  
• Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Levits

Advocate General

Trstenjak

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French