Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 July 2010.

Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v European Commission.

State aid - Training aid - Decision declaring the aid to be in part compatible and in part incompatible with the common market - Need for the aid - Positive external effects - Obligation to give reasons.

Case T-396/08.



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
28/08/2010 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2010:297
08/07/2010 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2010:297
08/07/2010 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission
Application (OJ)
20/12/2008 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2010 II-00141*

Pub somm

Subject-matter

Partial annulment of Commission Decision C (2008) 3178 final of 2 July 2008 declaring part of the aid which Germany intends to grant to DHL, in the form of subsidies for a training project concerning certain jobs at its new delivery and air freight centre at Leipzig/Halle airport, to be incompatible with the common market (C 18/2007 (ex N 874/2006))

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.05 Aid for training
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.05 Aid for training
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.07 Interpretation of EU law
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.05 Aid for training
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
      4.09.04.06 Formal investigation procedure
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.05 Aid for training
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
      4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
        4.09.03.02.05 Aid for training
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
    2.05.06 Statement of reasons


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 15/09/2008

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

08/07/2010


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 327 from 20.12.2008, p.30

Judgment: OJ C 234 from 28.08.2010, p.33

Name of the parties

Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Idot, Laurence: Aides à la formation, Europe 2010 Octobre nº 10 Comm. p.30
  2. Stromsky, Bruno: Le Tribunal confirme qu'une aide qui n'est pas nécessaire pour atteindre un objetctif d'intérêt commun (en l'occurrence la formation des employés) n'est pas compatible avec le marché commun, Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2010 nº4 p.178-180
  3. Winkelhüsener, Beate ; Schmitz, Jan-Volkert: Von der Automobilindustrie zur Luftfracht: Strenge Prüfung der Erforderlichkeit von Ausildungsbeihilfen durch die Kommission vom EuG als rechtmässig erkannt, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2010 nº 23 p.897-899
  4. Haegler, Urs: Annotation on Case T-396/08, Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2011 Vol. 10 Nº 2 p.369-374



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - State aid

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Papasavvas

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available