Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Appeal — Application before the General Court of the European Union signed by a ‘juris kandidat’ — No representation by a lawyer — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Manifest inadmissibility of the action

Case C‑101/14 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Application (OJ)
22/08/2014 Brown Brothers Harriman v OHIM
Order
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2115
17/07/2014 Brown Brothers Harriman v OHIM
Order (Information)
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2115
17/07/2014 Brown Brothers Harriman v OHIM
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.01 Parties, legal representation, legal aid
3 Legal proceedings
  3.08 Procedural rules
    3.08.05 Compliance with time-limits


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 20/02/2014

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

17/07/2014


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Order: OJ C 303 from 08.09.2014, p.3

Application: OJ C 303 from 08.09.2014, p.3

Name of the parties

Brown Brothers Harriman v OHIM

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Mengozzi

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available