Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Højesteret – Interpretation of Articles 2 and 5(1) and (5) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10) – Company which has as its main activity the compilation of summaries of newspaper articles by means of scanning – Storage of an extract of an article consisting of a search word with the five words which precede it and the five words which follow it – Temporary acts of reproduction which constitute an integral and essential part of a technological process

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 2001/29 -A01P1 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2001/29 -A02LA : paragraph 5
• Directive 2001/29 -A05P1 : paragraphs 1, 23, 25, 28 - 54, 57
• Directive 2001/29 -A05P5 : paragraphs 1, 23, 28, 55 - 57
• Directive 2001/29 -C4 : paragraphs 3, 6
• Directive 2001/29 -C9 : paragraphs 3, 6
• Directive 2001/29 -C10 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2001/29 -C11 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2001/29 -C21 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2001/29 -C22 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2001/29 -C31 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2001/29 -C33 : paragraphs 3, 42, 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 : paragraphs 26 - 28, 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/08 : paragraphs 27, 42, 48, 50, 56

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2001/29 -A05P1
• Interprets : Directive 2001/29 -A05P5

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 18/06/2010

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

17/01/2012

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 221 from 14.08.2010, p.31

Order: OJ C 73 from 10.03.2012, p.8

Name of the parties

Infopaq International

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Idot, Laurence: Droits d'auteur et société de l'information, Europe 2012 Mai Comm. nº 3 p.25-26 (FR)
2. Axhamn, Johan: CJUE, Ordonanţa din 17 ianuarie 2012, Cauza C-302/10, Infopaq International A/S împotriva Danske Dagblades Forening, Pandectele Romane: repertoriu trimestrial de jurisprudenta, doctrina si legislatie 2012 nº 2 p.173-178 (RO)
3. Spoor, J.H.: AMI: Tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media & informatierecht 2012 p.79-80 (NL)
4. Borrás, Alegría ; Pellisé, Cristina: Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea - Propiedad intelectual - Auto de 17 de enero de 2012, Asunto C-302/10, de Infopaq International A/S c. Danske Dagblades Forening, Revista Jurídica de Catalunya 2012 nº 3 p.261-263 (ES)
5. Walter, Michel M.: Einscannen und Digitalisieren von Zeitungsartikeln, MR-Int : Internationale Rundschau zum Medienrecht, IP- & IT-Recht 2013 p.66-68 (DE)
6. Harkai, István: Az időleges többszörözési kivétel az Európai Unió Bíróságának joggyakorlatában. II. rész, Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle 2019 6. szám p. 42-58 (HU)
7. Harkai, István: Az időleges többszörözési kivétel az Európai Unió Bíróságának joggyakorlatában : II. rész, Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle 2019 6. szám p. 42-58 (HU)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Højesteret - Denmark

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  
• - Copyright and related rights
  
• Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Lov om ophavsret, § 11a. stk. 1

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Malenovský

Advocate General

Trstenjak

Language(s) of the Case

• Danish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available