Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 92/2 of 9 January 2009 ordering Prysmian SpA and all undertakings controlled by it to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation No 1/2003, adopted in Article 81 EC proceedings concerning the European market in electrical cables and related material (Case COMP/39610 – Surge)
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
4.08.03.02.05 Investigations
|
|
|
3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.01 Acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraph 75
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
-P1 : paragraphs 97, 103, 108
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 230
: paragraphs 93, 111
-
Regulation 17/62
: paragraph 105
-
Regulation 4064/89
-A08P2 : paragraph 49
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000)
-A07 : paragraph 35
-
Decision 2003/176
: paragraph 49
-
Decision 2003/176
-C14 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C15 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C16 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C17 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C18 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C19 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C20 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C21 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C22 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C23 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C24 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C25 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C26 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C27 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C28 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C29 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C30 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C31 : paragraph 72
-
Decision 2003/176
-C32 : paragraphs 72, 87
-
Regulation 1/2003
: paragraphs 22, 23, 27 - 30, 41, 45, 46, 51, 53, 55, 57, 66, 96
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A01 : paragraph 47
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A18P3 : paragraphs 100, 101
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A20P2LC : paragraphs 98, 100
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A20P2LE : paragraph 100
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A20P4 : paragraphs 32, 33, 38, 49, 50, 61, 62, 64, 69, 70, 98, 99
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A23P1 : paragraph 48
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A23P1LC : paragraph 103
-
Non-opposition to a Notified Concentration - 32005M3836
-P12 : paragraph 74
-
Non-opposition to a Notified Concentration - 32006M4050
: paragraph 74
-
Commission - Other Acts - 52006XC1208(04)
: paragraph 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/79
: paragraphs 104, 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/81
: paragraphs 93, 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/87
: paragraphs 36, 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/87
: paragraphs 34, 37, 39
-
General Court - Judgment T -10/92
: paragraph 93
-
Court of Justice - Order C -199/94
: paragraph 111
-
General Court - Judgment T -305/94
: paragraph 108
-
General Court - Judgment T -59/99
: paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/00
: paragraphs 35, 38
-
General Court - Judgment T -213/01
: paragraph 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/03
: paragraph 109
-
Court of Justice - Order C -224/03
: paragraph 111
-
General Court - Judgment T -125/03
: paragraphs 104, 105
-
General Court - Judgment T -340/04
: paragraph 39
-
General Court - Judgment T -145/06
: paragraph 111
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
14/11/2012
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 141 from 20.06.2009, p.50
Judgment: OJ C 399 from 22.12.2012, p.17
Name of the parties
Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Déroulement des inspections sur décision, Europe 2013 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.39-40 (FR)
- Laghezza, Angela: From the Nexans judgment to the "next" improvements of the EU dawn raid procedure?, European Competition Law Review 2013 p.214-217 (EN)
- Puel, Frédéric: Nexans: Some Limitations to Inspections Carried Out by the European Commission in the Context of Investigations, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2013 Vol. 4 nº 4 p.312-314 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : application granted
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
Formation of the Court
huitième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Kanninen
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available