Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Bundesfinanzhof – Interpretation of Article 56(1)(e) and Article 135(1)(f) and (g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) – Exemption of operations consisting in individual portfolio management for private clients
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.10 Tax provisions
4.10.02 Harmonization of tax legislation
4.10.02.01 Value added tax
4.10.02.01.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.10 Tax provisions
4.10.02 Harmonization of tax legislation
4.10.02.01 Value added tax
4.10.02.01.07 Exemptions
4.10.02.01.07.02 Exemptions for other activities
4.10.02.01.07.02.04 Transactions in securities
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.10 Tax provisions
4.10.02 Harmonization of tax legislation
4.10.02.01 Value added tax
4.10.02.01.03 Place of taxable transactions
4.10.02.01.03.03 Place of supply of services
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Directive 85/611
-A01P2 : paragraph 32
-
Directive 2006/112
-A56 : paragraph 3
-
Directive 2006/112
-A56P1LE : paragraphs 15, 47, 48, 50 - 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135 : paragraph 4
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1 : paragraph 42
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LA : paragraphs 15, 47, 49 - 52, 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LB : paragraphs 15, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LC : paragraphs 15, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LD : paragraphs 15, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LE : paragraphs 15, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LF : paragraphs 15, 30, 39, 40, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LG : paragraphs 15, 30, 31, 35, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -327/94
: paragraph 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/95
: paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/99
: paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -235/00
: paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/01
: paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04
: paragraphs 18, 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/04
: paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/08
: paragraph 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -497/09
: paragraph 18
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -259/11
: paragraph 36
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 77/388
-A09P2 : point 74
-
Directive 77/388
-A09P2LET5 : point 3
-
Directive 77/388
-A13LBLDPT1 : point 36
-
Directive 77/388
-A13LBLDPT2 : point 36
-
Directive 77/388
-A13LBLDPT3 : point 36
-
Directive 77/388
-A13LBLDPT4 : point 36
-
Directive 77/388
-A13LBLDPT5 : points 5, 36
-
Directive 77/388
-A13LBLDPT6 : points 5, 36
-
Directive 77/388
-A15P2 : point 4
-
Directive 2004/39
: point 74
-
Directive 2006/112
-A56P1 : point 3
-
Directive 2006/112
-A56P1LE : points 12, 64 - 67, 69 - 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A59LE : point 3
-
Directive 2006/112
-A131 : point 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A132 : point 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A133 : point 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A134 : point 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135 : points 35, 51, 66
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1 : points 5, 54
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LA : points 4, 12, 65, 67, 69, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LB : points 4, 12, 36, 65, 69 - 71, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LC : points 4, 12, 36, 65, 69 - 71, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LD : points 4, 12, 36, 65, 69 - 71, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LE : points 4, 12, 36, 65, 69 - 71, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LF : points 4, 12, 16, 17, 20, 33, 34, 37, 38, 45 - 47, 49 - 53, 56, 57, 61 - 63, 65, 69 - 71, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LG : points 4, 12, 14, 36, 44 - 46, 57, 58, 62, 65, 69 - 71, 73, 75
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P1LL : points 6, 72
-
Directive 2006/112
-A135P2LD : points 6, 72
-
Directive 2006/112
-A136 : point 35
-
Directive 2006/112
-A137 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -327/94
: point 74
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -235/00
: points 36, 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/04
: points 24, 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/04
: points 4, 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -111/05
: point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/05
: point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -572/07
: points 25, 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -174/08
: point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/08
: points 19, 67, 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -276/09
: points 24, 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -497/09
: points 20, 31
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -540/09
: point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -540/09
: points 35, 36, 40
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
19/07/2012
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 145 from 14.05.2011, p.6
Judgment: OJ C 295 from 29.09.2012, p.7
Name of the parties
Deutsche Bank
Notes on Academic Writings
- Van Norden, Gert-Jan: Highlights & Insights on European Taxation 2012 nº 10 p.66-68 (EN)
- Féron, Ivan: L'exonération des opérations sur titres de sociétés ne s'applique pas à la gestion de patrimoine au moyen de valeurs mobilières, Revue de droit fiscal 2012 nº 454 p.50-53 (FR)
- Mosbrucker, Anne-Laure: Exonération de TVA, Europe 2012 Octobre Comm. nº 10 p.44-45 (FR)
- Sedlacek, Max: Portfolioverwaltung im Hinblick auf MwSt-Befreiung, Ecolex 2012 p.823-824 (DE)
- Dahm, Joachim ; Hamacher, Rolfjosef: Vermögensverwaltung und Umsatzsteuer - Abgrenzung zweier EuGH-Entscheidungen, Umsatzsteuer-Rundschau 2012 p.817-820 (DE)
- Thunshirn, Roman: Vorsteuerabzug und Umsatzsteuerpflicht für Bankspesen - Bestandsprovisionen im Lichte der EuGH-Rechtsprechung, Betriebs-Berater 2013 p.1117-1124 (DE)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Bundesfinanzhof - Germany
Subject-matter
- Taxation
- - Value added tax
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
deuxième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Rosas
Advocate General
Sharpston
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion