Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Opinion
-
Regulation 44/2001
: points 1, 22, 24, 53, 55, 57 - 59
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02P1 : points 1, 3, 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05 : point 4
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : points 1, 2, 22, 24 - 28, 30, 35, 44, 48, 49, 51, 5759
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C19 : point 24
-
Regulation 44/2001
-CH2S2 : point 27
-
Regulation 864/2007
: point 53
-
Regulation 593/2008
: point 53
-
Brussels Convention 1968
: points 24, 55, 56
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05P1 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -21/76
: points 31, 36, 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -21/76
-N24 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/81
-N8 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -365/88
-N19 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -365/88
-N20 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/93
-N35 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/93
-N36 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -364/93
: points 18, 32, 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -364/93
-N21 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N27 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -80/00
-N43 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -18/02
-N23 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
: point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
-N21 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/08
-N19 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/08
-N23 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/08
-N24 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/08
-N36 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
-N50 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N23 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N24 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N44 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N45 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/12
-N20 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -375/13
-N64 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -375/13
-N69 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/13
-N23 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13
: point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13
-N37 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13
-N52 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
: points 44, 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N43 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N54 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N57 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N65 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -47/14
-N72 : point 27
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
16/06/2016
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 305 from 22.08.2016, p.7
Application: OJ C 89 from 16.03.2015, p.12
Name of the parties
Universal Music International Holding
Notes on Academic Writings
- Nourissat, Cyril: Essai de cantonnement de la portée du forum actoris en matière délictuelle, Procédures 2016 nº 8-9 p.16 (FR)
- Nourissat, Cyril: Essai de cantonnement de la portée du forum actoris en matière délictuelle, Procédures 2016 nº 8-9 p.16 (FR)
- Morel-Maroger, Juliette: Le compte bancaire ne permet pas à lui seul de localiser le préjudice financier, Gazette du Palais 2016 nº 33 Jur. p.81-82 (FR)
- Schotel, Olivier: Groot is de wereld, maar wanneer is de rechter van de plaats waar zuivere vermogensschade is geleden bevoegd?, Nederlands internationaal privaatrecht 2016 Afl.3 p.478-484 (NL)
- Müller, Michael F.: Deliktsgerichtsstand am Erfolgsort bei reinen Vermögensschäden, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2016 p.2169-2170 (DE)
- Idot, Laurence: Coup d'arrêt à la possibilité d'admettre comme « lieu du fait dommageable » au sens de l'article 5, point 3, le lieu d'un préjudice exclusivement financier résultant d'un acte illicite commis dans un autre État membre, Europe 2016 Septembre Comm. nº 8-9 p.54-55 (FR)
- Idot, Laurence: Coup d'arrêt à la possibilité d'admettre comme « lieu du fait dommageable » au sens de l'article 5, point 3, le lieu d'un préjudice exclusivement financier résultant d'un acte illicite commis dans un autre État membre, Europe 2016 Septembre Comm. nº 8-9 p.50-51 (FR)
- Skubic, Zoran: Odgovornost za malomarno delo odvetnikov s čezmejnimi učinki po pravu Unije, Pravna praksa 2016 nº 28 p.26-27 (SL)
- Wautelet, Patrick: Arrêt « Universal Music » : détermination du forum delicti, Journal de droit européen 2016 nº 234 p.386-388 (FR)
- Zaprianos, Nikolaos: Deliktsgerichtsstand am Erfolgsort bei reinen Vermögensschäden, Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht 2016 p.251-255 (DE)
- Combet, Mathieu: Arrêt "Universal Music", Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2016 nº 3/4 p.661-666 (FR)
- Pfitzner, Tanja V.: Internationale Zuständigkeit – Gerichtsstand der unerlaubten Handlung, IWRZ – Zeitschrift für internationales Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.232 (DE)
- Kruger, T. ; Rys, M.: Waar dagvaarden in geval van een grensoverschrijdende onrechtmatige daad? Over schadeveroorzakende gebeurtenissen en schade, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2017 p.367-373 (NL)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Netherlands
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
Formation of the Court
deuxième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Toader
Advocate General
Szpunar
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion