Reports of Cases

2010 II-00128*

Pub somm

Subject-matter

Annulment of the Commission’s Decisions of 2 August 2006 and 13 February 2007 refusing to grant the applicant access to certain unpublished documents concerning a procedure relating to a concentration of undertakings (Case COMP/M.3543 – PKN Orlen/Unipetrol)

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 287 : paragraphs 68, 70
• EU Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 1 -L2 : paragraph 42
• EU Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 6 -P2 : paragraph 75
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2000) -A07 : paragraph 75
• Regulation 1049/2001 : paragraphs 43, 71, 88
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A02P3 : paragraph 80
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04 : paragraphs 57, 85, 124, 129, 147, 149
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P1 : paragraph 59
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P2 : paragraphs 42, 44, 58, 59, 70
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P2T1 : paragraphs 46, 51, 53, 55, 70, 72, 76 - 78, 80
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P2T2 : paragraphs 119, 121, 122, 128
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P2T3 : paragraphs 46, 91, 94, 96, 100, 103
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P3 : paragraphs 42, 44, 58, 59, 139
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P3L2 : paragraphs 135, 138, 142, 144, 146, 150
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P4 : paragraph 77
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A04P6 : paragraphs 60, 108, 112
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A07 : paragraph 34
• Regulation 1049/2001 -A08 : paragraph 34
• Regulation 139/2004 -A17 : paragraphs 70, 81, 83
• Regulation 139/2004 -A17P1 : paragraph 88
• Regulation 139/2004 -A17P2 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/81 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/81 : paragraph 74
• General Court - Judgment T -115/94 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/97 : paragraph 74
• General Court - Judgment T -204/99 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -274/99 : paragraph 75
• General Court - Judgment T -3/00 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/00 : paragraph 40
• General Court - Judgment T -213/01 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -353/01 : paragraph 40
• General Court - Judgment T -2/03 : paragraphs 58, 59, 79
• General Court - Judgment T -198/03 : paragraph 69
• General Court - Judgment T -391/03 : paragraphs 33, 35, 58 - 60, 97, 110
• General Court - Judgment T -380/04 : paragraph 53
• General Court - Judgment T -474/04 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/05 : paragraphs 57, 123 - 125, 129
• General Court - Judgment T -121/05 : paragraph 85
• General Court - Judgment T -144/05 : paragraphs 141, 142, 147
• General Court - Judgment T -437/05 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -450/06 : paragraph 76

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 13/04/2007

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

07/07/2010

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 129 from 09.06.2007, p.21

Judgment: OJ C 221 from 14.08.2010, p.35

Name of the parties

Agrofert Holding v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Idot, Laurence: Le règlement nº 1049/2001 doit-il s'appliquer aux « procédures concurrence » ?, Europe 2010 Octobre nº 10 Etude p.5-11

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Provisions governing the institutions
  
• Competition
  
• - Concentrations between undertakings
  
• - Access to documents
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  
• Actions for annulment : application granted
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Dehousse

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available