Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.03 Copyright and related rights
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Directive 2001/29
-A02 : paragraph 5
-
Directive 2001/29
-A05P2 : paragraph 6
-
Directive 2001/29
-A05P2LB : paragraphs 1, 15, 16, 17, 20, 23, 24, 37, 48, 53
-
Directive 2001/29
-A05P3 : paragraph 11
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02P1 : paragraphs 3, 27
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1 : paragraphs 4, 34
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1LA : paragraphs 32, 35, 36, 38
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : paragraphs 1, 4, 13, 15, 27, 28, 30, 40, 44, 51, 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -21/76
-N16 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N17 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N18 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -18/02
-N32 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -467/08
-N40 : paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N24 : paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N28 : paragraph 22
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N34 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N35 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N36 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N39 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/09
-N41 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
-N38 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N23 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N26 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N27 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N46 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N47 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
: paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N23 : paragraph 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N24 : paragraph 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N25 : paragraph 22
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N26 : paragraph 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N27 : paragraph 25
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N32 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N47 : paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N57 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N58 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N59 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/12
-N50 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/12
-N24 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/12
-N27 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N44 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N47 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12
-N50 : paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12
-N51 : paragraph 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N19 : paragraph 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N20 : paragraph 18
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N21 : paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N23 : paragraph 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/12
-N20 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13
-N37 : paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13
-N40 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N38 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N39 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N43 : paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N44 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N46 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/13
-N17 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/13
-N19 : paragraph 30
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 2001/29
-A02 : points 6, 31
-
Directive 2001/29
-A05P2 : point 7
-
Directive 2001/29
-A05P2LB : points 1, 19, 23, 27, 29, 32, 33, 35, 57, 60, 61, 79, 90, 91, 94
-
Regulation 44/2001
: point 3
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02P1 : points 4, 54
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1 : point 5
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1LA : points 53, 56 - 59, 61, 91
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : points 1, 19, 23 - 26, 31, 51 - 53, 56, 62 - 65, 72, 76, 77, 82, 84, 87, 88, 91 - 94
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : point 5
-
Regulation 44/2001
-S2 : point 5
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A80 : point 3
-
Brussels Convention 1968
: point 53
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05PT1 : points 53, 59
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05PT3 : points 53, 64, 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -21/76
-N16 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -21/76
-N18 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -21/76
-N24 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N17 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -18/02
-N32 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/02
-N50 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/02
-N51 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
-N14 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
-N16 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
-N18 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
-N38 : point 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N27 : point 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N46 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N47 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -457/11
-N31 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
: points 37, 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N23 : points 34, 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N24 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N25 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N26 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/11
-N27 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/12
-N25 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/12
-N47 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/12
-N26 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/12
-N40 : point 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12
-N50 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12
-N51 : points 34, 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12
-N52 : points 43, 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N22 : points 34, 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N23 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/12
-N53 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/12
-N19 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/12
-N20 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N39 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N44 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/13
-N18 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/13
-N38 : point 31
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
21/04/2016
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 211 from 13.06.2016, p.18
Application: OJ C 81 from 09.03.2015, p.5
Name of the parties
Austro-Mechana
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Matière délictuelle ou quasi-délictuelle, Europe 2016 Juin Comm. nº 6 p.39 (FR)
- Nourissat, Cyril: Nature délictuelle de l'action visant à recouvrer une "rémunération équitable" pour mise en circulation d'un support d'enregistrement, Procédures 2016 nº 6 p.21 (FR)
- Anderl, Axel ; Heinzl, Bernhard: Internationale Zuständigkeit für Ausgleichsklage bei Privatkopieausnahme, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.550-551 (DE)
- Skubic, Zoran: Še o pravici do zasebne reprodukcije po pravu EU: kje tožiti?, Pravna praksa 2016 nº 33 p.30-31 (SL)
- Lutzi, Tobias: Die Qualifikation des Anspruchs auf Zahlung einer Privatkopievergütung und das Merkmal der „Schadenshaftung“ im Rahmen des Art. 5 Nr. 3 EuGVVO 2001 (Art. 7 Abs. 2 EuGVVO), Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 2016 p.550-553 (DE)
- Rasmussen-Bonne, Hans-Eric ; Servatius, Michael: Ein besonderer Gerichtsstand für urheberrechtliche Vergütungsansprüche, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2016 p.275-278 (DE)
- Azzi, Tristan: Arrêt Austro-Mechana : compétence judiciaire internationale en matière de rémunération pour copie privée, Dalloz IP / IT 2016 nº 7-8 p.258-362 (FR)
- Pastuglia, Gian Luca: AIDA - Annali italiani del diritto d'autore, della cultura e dello spettacolo (Ed. Giuffrè-Milano) 2017 p.656-658 (IT)
- Berendschot, Huib ; Janssens, Karel: On claims for payment of ‘fair compensation’, Landmark IP Decisions of the European Court of Justice (2014-2018) (Larcier) 2019 p. 128-133 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria
Subject-matter
- Freedom of establishment
- Freedom to provide services
- Approximation of laws
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Provisions of national law referred to
Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG) (in der Fassung vom 25/07/1994), Paragraph 42b
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
première chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General
Saugmandsgaard Øe
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion