Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber), 5 July 2012

DTZ Zadelhoff vof v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 5(3)(c) and 13B(d)(5) — Negotiation of a transaction involving the transfer of company shares — Transaction which also entails the transfer of the ownership of immovable property held by such companies — Exemption

Case C‑259/11


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
07/09/2012 DTZ Zadelhoff
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2012:423
05/07/2012 DTZ Zadelhoff
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2012:423
05/07/2012 DTZ Zadelhoff
Application (OJ)
11/08/2011 DTZ Zadelhoff
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Reference for a preliminary ruling - Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Interpretation of Articles 5(3)(c) and 13B(d)(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) - Exemptions laid down in the Sixth Directive - Transactions relating to the securities referred to in Article 13B(d)(5) - Transfer of shares of companies also entailing the transfer of the ownership of immovable property belonging to those companies.

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.10 Tax provisions
    4.10.02 Harmonization of tax legislation
      4.10.02.01 Value added tax
        4.10.02.01.07 Exemptions
          4.10.02.01.07.02 Exemptions for other activities
            4.10.02.01.07.02.04 Transactions in securities


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 26/05/2011

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

05/07/2012


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 252 from 27.08.2011, p.14

Judgment: OJ C 287 from 22.09.2012, p.14

Name of the parties

DTZ Zadelhoff

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Huisman, Nicolette: ECJ Considers Substance Over Form In Dutch VAT Case, Tax Notes International 2012 p.403-407 (EN)
  2. Mosbrucker, Anne-Laure: Exonération de TVA, Europe 2012 Août-Septembre Comm. nº 8-9 p.48 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Netherlands

Subject-matter

  • Taxation
  • - Value added tax

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

sixième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rosas

Advocate General

Jääskinen

Language(s) of the Case

  • Dutch

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available