Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2011 in Case T532/11 Städter v ECB, by which the General Court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible the action brought by the applicant seeking annulment, first, of the decisions of the ECB of 6 May 2010, 31 March 2011 and 7 July 2011 on temporary measures relating to the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or guaranteed by the Greek, Irish and Portuguese Governments (OJ 2010 L 117, p. 102; OJ 2011 L 94, p. 33; OJ 2011 L 182, p. 31) and, second, the ECB’s decision of 14 May 2010 establishing a securities markets programme (OJ 2010 L 124, p. 8)
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.05 Limitation periods
3.02.05.01 Starting point
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.05 Limitation periods
3.02.05.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
15/11/2012
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 399 from 22.12.2012, p.8
Name of the parties
Städter v ECB
Notes on Academic Writings
Information not available
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Economic and monetary policy
- - European Central Bank (ECB)
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment
- Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
Formation of the Court
sixième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Fernlund
Advocate General
Jääskinen
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available