Reports of Cases
not yet published (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Haparanda tingsrätt – Interpretation of Article 6 TEU and Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National case-law requiring a clear basis in the European Convention on Human Rights or the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in order to disapply provisions of national law possibly contrary to the ne bis in idem principle – National legislation under which the same act contrary to tax law may be punished both administratively by a tax surcharge and criminally by a term of imprisonment – Compatibility with the ne bis in idem principle of a national system involving two separate sets of proceedings to penalise the same wrongful conduct
Systematic classification scheme
Information not available
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
07/05/2013
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Information not available
Name of the parties
Åkerberg Fransson
Notes on Academic Writings
Information not available
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Haparanda tingsrätt - Sweden
Subject-matter
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
- - European Convention on Human Rights
Provisions of national law referred to
Skattebrottslag (1971:69), 2 § och 4 § Taxeringslag (1990:324), 5 kapitlet, 1 §, 4 § och 15 §
Provisions of international law referred to
Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales, protocole nº 7 (22/11/1984), art. 4, du protocole nº 7
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Safjan
Advocate General
Cruz Villalón
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available