Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2004.

Wolff & Müller GmbH & Co. KG v José Filipe Pereira Félix.

Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesarbeitsgericht - Germany.

Article 49 EC - Restrictions on freedom to provide services - Undertakings in the construction sector - Subcontracting - Obligation on an undertaking to act as guarantor in respect of the minimum remuneration of workers employed by a subcontractor.

Case C-60/03.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
04/12/2004 Wolff & Müller
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2004:610
12/10/2004 Wolff & Müller
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2004:610
12/10/2004 Wolff & Müller
Application (OJ)
10/05/2003 Wolff & Müller
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2004 I-09553

Subject-matter

Interpretation of Article 49 EC ─ Compatibility of national legislation under which a building contractor is regarded as guarantor of the obligation to pay the minimum wage to workers employed by subcontractors ─ Legislation the principal objective of which is not the protection of workers

Systematic classification scheme

1.
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-04 Free movement of persons and services
    B-04.04 Freedom to provide services
      B-04.04.01 The various services


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 14/02/2003

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/10/2004


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 112 from 10.05.2003, p.9

Judgment: OJ C 300 from 04.12.2004, p.18

Name of the parties

Wolff & Müller

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Lettner, Harald: Bürgenhaftung des Bauunternehmers für Entgeltzahlungen des Subunternehmers im Lichte der Dienstleistungsfreiheit mit entsandten Arbeitskräften, European Law Reporter 2004 p.467-468
  2. Idot, Laurence: Détachement des travailleurs. Qualification de l'exigence impérieuse d'intérêt général, Europe 2004 Décembre Comm. nº 406 p.19
  3. Veiga, Maria de Fátima: Mindestlohnverpflichtung des Subunternehmers nach dem AEntG - Haftung des Bauunternehmers, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 2005 p.208-210
  4. Bonechi, Leonardo: La normativa interna a tutela del lavoratore non costituisce ostacolo alla libera prestazione dei servizi, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2005 p.365-366
  5. Houwerzijl, M.S.: Minimumloonregeling voor gedetacheerde werknemers rechtvaardigt belemmeringen van het vrije dienstenverkeer, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2005 p.185-190
  6. Pataut, Etienne: Revue critique de droit international privé 2005 p.344-351
  7. Meyer, Francis: Droit communautaire du travail, Recueil Le Dalloz 2005 Pan. p.2783-2789
  8. Lhernould, Jean-Philippe: L'actualité de la jurisprudence communautaire et internationale, Revue de jurisprudence sociale 2005 p.189-192
  9. Ricci, G.: Il Foro italiano 2006 IV Col.25-27



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesarbeitsgericht - Germany

Subject-matter

  • Freedom of establishment
  • Freedom to provide services

Provisions of national law referred to

Verordnung über zwingende Arbeitsbedingungen im Baugewerbe, Paragraph 1 Arbeitnehmer-Entsendegesetz (AEntG), Paragraph 1 Abs. 3a Sozialgesetzbuch, Drittes Buch (SGB III), Drittes Buch, Paragraph 211 Abs. 1

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Timmermans

Advocate General

Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available