Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 36
• Directive 2004/83 : paragraphs 25, 33, 39, 40, 48
• Directive 2004/83 -A02LA : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/83 -A02LE : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/83 -A02LF : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/83 -A15 : paragraph 26
• Directive 2004/83 -A18 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2005/85 : paragraphs 5, 26, 27
• Directive 2005/85 -A03P1 : paragraphs 6, 26
• Directive 2005/85 -A03P3 : paragraphs 7, 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/03 -N29 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/08 -N28 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/08 -N48 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N39 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N41 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/13 -N74 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -505/14 -N41 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -429/15 : paragraphs 32, 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -233/15 -N30 : paragraph 36

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 63 -L1PT1 : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P2LA : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P2LB : points 55, 61
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P2LD : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P2LF : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : points 22, 23, 35, 47
  
• Directive 2004/83 : points 3, 7, 20, 55, 67, 72, 88
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A01 : point 37
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A02LC : point 37
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A02LE : points 2, 37, 61, 62, 70
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A15 : points 69, 70
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A24 : point 64
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A25 : point 64
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A26 : point 64
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A28 : point 64
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C1 : point 56
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C5 : point 62
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C6 : point 56
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C7 : point 56
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C24 : point 62
  
• Directive 2004/83 -CH7 : points 37, 64
  
• Directive 2005/85 : points 40, 55, 62
  
• Directive 2005/85 -A01 : point 38
  
• Directive 2005/85 -A03 : point 39
  
• Directive 2005/85 -C1 : point 56
  
• Directive 2005/85 -C3 : point 56
  
• Directive 2005/85 -C4 : point 56
  
• Directive 2005/85 -C5 : point 56
  
• Directive 2005/85 -C6 : point 56
  
• Directive 2005/85 -CH2 : point 38
  
• Directive 2005/85 -CH3 : point 38
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C8 : point 56
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C9 : point 56
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C10 : point 56
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C12 : point 56
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C13 : point 56
  
• Recommendation - 32012H1106(01) -PT22 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A94LB : point 25
  
• Directive 2013/32 : points 3, 63
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A10P2 : point 62
  
• Directive 2013/32 -C13 : point 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/03 -N29 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/09 -N26 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -416/10 -N85 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -613/10 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -277/11 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -277/11 -N19 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/11 : points 3, 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11 : points 3, 30, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11 -N72 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11 -N73 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -144/11 -N10 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -144/11 -N9 : points 22, 47
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -560/11 -N24 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -603/11 -N15 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -604/12 -N27 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 : points 3, 30, 31, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N32 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N33 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N38 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -604/12 -N41 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -107/13 -N29 : points 22, 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/13 -N47 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/13 -N48 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/13 -N22 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -383/13 -N35 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/13 -N73 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/13 -N74 : points 42, 65
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -560/14 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/14 -N25 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/14 -N32 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -107/14 -N12 : point 29
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 05/08/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 29/06/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

20/10/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 475 from 19.12.2016, p.7

Application: OJ C 320 from 28.09.2015, p.23

Name of the parties

Danqua

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Simon, Denys: La méthode classique d'encadrement de l'autonomie procédurale du droit national par les principes d'équivalence et d'effectivité est-elle adaptée pour juger de la validité du délai imposé par le droit national pour le dépôt d'une demande de protection subsidiaire ?, Europe 2016 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.24-25 (FR)
2. Simon, Denys: Délais de demande du statut, Europe 2016 Décembre nº 12 p.24-25 (FR)
3. Reneman, M.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2017 Afl.10 p.583-585 (NL)
4. Antloga, Alenka: Učinkovitost postopka obravnavanja prošnje za subsidiarno zaščito, Pravna praksa 2017 nº 7-8 p.33-34 (SL)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Court of Appeal - Ireland

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bay Larsen

Advocate General

Bot

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French