Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: paragraphs 1, 13, 16, 18, 21
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L2 : paragraph 41
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : paragraph 29
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraph 43
-
TEU, Article 2
: paragraphs 3, 30, 32
-
TEU, Article 4
-P3L1 : paragraph 34
-
TEU, Article 19
: paragraph 32
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : paragraph 4
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1L2 : paragraphs 1, 13, 16, 18, 21, 27, 29, 34, 35, 40, 52
-
TEU, Article 19
-P2 : paragraph 4
-
TEU, Article 19
-P2L3 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04
-N49 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04
-N51 : paragraphs 44, 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
-N37 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09
-N29 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09
-N30 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09
-N31 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09
-N32 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09
-N33 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09
-N66 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09
-N68 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09
-N69 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N100 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N101 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N90 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N91 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N94 : paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N99 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/13
-N45 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13
-N168 : paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/14
: paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N47 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15
-N73 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -444/15
-N36 : paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -503/15
-N27 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -503/15
-N37 : paragraph 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -685/15
-N60 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -64/16
: paragraph 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16
-N40 : paragraph 42
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6
: point 76
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: points 2, 10, 13, 14, 22, 24, 35 - 37, 42 - 44, 53 - 54, 56, 65, 69 - 72, 77, 81, 83
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L1 : point 62
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-P2 : point 71
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-P4 : point 71
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
: points 37, 44, 45, 48, 51, 53
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : points 12, 38, 43, 62
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P2 : point 43
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P3 : points 71, 72
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A23 : point 20
-
TFEU, Article 126
: point 48
-
TFEU, Article 126
-P7 : point 51
-
TFEU, Article 267
: points 20, 23, 29
-
TFEU, Article 288
-L4 : point 51
-
TFEU, Article 288
-L5 : point 51
-
TEU, Article 6
-P1 : point 43
-
TEU, Article 19
: points 24, 37 - 39, 54, 56, 59, 60, 62, 63
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : points 2, 10
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1L2 : points 13, 14, 22, 35, 36, 42, 56 - 58, 61, 64, 66, 68, 83
-
TEU, Article 19
-P2 : point 60
-
Decision 2009/459
: point 48
-
Decision 2010/288
: points 4, 46
-
Regulation 407/2010
: points 4, 52
-
Decision 2011/344
: point 4
-
Decision 2011/344
-A03P8LHL1 : point 52
-
Decision 2011/344
-A03P8LHL2 : point 52
-
Decision 2011/344
-C2 : point 50
-
Regulation 1177/2011
-A01 : point 52
-
Regulation 1177/2011
-C1 : point 52
-
Regulation 1177/2011
-C2 : point 52
-
Regulation 1177/2011
-C3 : point 52
-
Regulation 1177/2011
-C4 : point 52
-
Regulation 1177/2011
-C5 : point 52
-
Decision 2012/409
: point 52
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A94 : point 20
-
Decision 2014/234
: point 52
-
Recommendation - 32016H1125(01)
: point 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/08
-N28 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/08
-N29 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
-N32 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
-N33 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
-N34 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N17 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N18 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N19 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N20 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N21 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N22 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N23 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -583/11
-N34 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N27 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N28 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N29 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N30 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N31 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N32 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N100 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N101 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N102 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N90 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N99 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/12
: point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N44 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N45 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N46 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N47 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N48 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -128/12
-N12 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Order C -264/12
-N19 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/13
-N38 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/13
-N34 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/13
-N35 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/13
-N36 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/13
-N37 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N34 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/13
-N45 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/13
-N49 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/13
-N50 : points 61, 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N16 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N17 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N18 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N19 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N20 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N21 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N22 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13
-N23 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Order C -175/13
-N17 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -175/13
-N18 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -175/13
-N19 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -175/13
-N20 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -175/13
-N21 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -665/13
-N14 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -258/14
-N61 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/14
-N24 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/14
-N25 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/14
-N26 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/14
-N27 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14
-N39 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14
-N40 : point 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N47 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N48 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N49 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N50 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N51 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N52 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14
-N53 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/15
-N34 : point 70
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/15
-N37 : point 71
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/15
-N38 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -682/15
-N67 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/15
-N14 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/15
-N51 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/15
-N54 : point 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -444/15
-N36 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -503/15
-N37 : point 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -532/15
-N28 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -601/15
-N45 : point 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -682/15
-N44 : point 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -682/15
-N49 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -682/15
-N54 : points 70, 71
-
Court of Justice - Order C -322/15
-N15 : point 19
-
Court of Justice - Order C -328/15
-N23 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Order C -328/15
-N24 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N32 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N34 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N35 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N36 : point 30
-
Court of Justice - Order C -53/16
-N18 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Order C -53/16
-N19 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Order C -484/16
-N43 : point 43
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
27/02/2018
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 142 from 23.04.2018, p.2
Application: OJ C 156 from 02.05.2016, p.23
Name of the parties
Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses
Notes on Academic Writings
- Simon, Denys: Indépendance des juges, Europe 2018 avril nº 4 p.11-12 (FR)
- Pereira Coutinho, Francisco: Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses: judicial independence and austerity measures at the Court of Justice, Quaderni costituzionali 2018 p.510-512 (EN, IT)
- Van den Eijnden, P.M.: AB 2018/220 - HvJ EU 27 februari 2018, C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses /Tribunal de Contas - Noot, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2018 nº 26 p.1387-1390 (NL)
- Bonelli, Matteo ; Claes, Monica: Judicial serendipity: how Portuguese judges came to the rescue of the Polish judiciary, European Constitutional Law Review 2018 Vol. 14 nº 3 p.622-643 (EN)
- Gremmelprez, Femke: Arrest Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses: een nieuwe dimensie aan de handhaving van het rechtsstaatsbeginsel in EU-lidstaten, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2018 p.470-474 (NL)
- Barcik, Jacek: Niezawisłość sędziowska jako wartość konstytucyjna Unii Europejskiej – glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z 27.02.2018 r., C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2018 Vol. 5 p.23-29 (PL)
- Pech, Laurent ; Platon, Sébastien: Judicial independence under threat:The Court of Justice to the rescue in the ASJP case, Common Market Law Review 2018 p.1827-1854 (EN)
- Miglio, Alberto: Indipendenza del giudice, crisi dello stato di diritto e tutela giurisdizionale effettiva negli Stati membri dell’Unione europea, Diritti umani e diritto internazionale 2018 p.421-431 (IT)
- Miglio, Alberto: Indipendenza del giudice, crisi dello stato di diritto e tutela giurisdizionale effettiva negli Stati membri dell'Unione europea, Diritti umani e diritto internazionale 2018 Vol.12 N°2 p.421-431 (IT)
- Keunen, Stef: Tijdelijke verlaging salarissen doet geen afbreuk aan onafhankelijkheid rechters, Tijdschrift voor bestuurswetenschappen en publiekrecht 2019 p.62-63 (NL)
- Coutron, Laurent: Chronique de jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (2018), Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l'étranger 2019 N°5 p.1417-1434 (FR)
- García-Valdecasas Dorrego, María José: El Tribunal de Justicia, centinela de la independencia judicial desde la sentencia Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (ASJP), Revista española de Derecho Europeo 2019 nº 72 p.75-96 (ES)
- Coutron, Laurent: V. Questions préjudicielles - Cour de justice, gde ch., 27 février 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, aff. C-64/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2018. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2019, p. 237-246 (FR)
- Menzione, Serena: Case Note: Anything New under the Sun? An Exercise in Defence of the Reasoning of the CJEU in the ASJP Case, Review of European administrative law 2019 p. 219-236 (EN)
- Benoit-Rohmer, Florence: Union européenne et droits fondamentaux - L'État de droit (CJUE, gr. ch., 27 févr. 2018, aff. C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117 ; CJUE, gr. ch., 10 oct. 2018, aff. C-216/18 PPU, Minister for Justice and Equality (LM), ECLI:EU:C:2018:586 ; CJUE 25 juill. 2018, aff. C-220/18 PPU, Generalstaatsanwaltschaft, ECLI:EU:C:2018:589 ; CJUE, gr. ch., 17 déc. 2018, aff. C-619/18 R, Commission c/ Pologne, EU:C:2018:1021), Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2019, n° 2, p. 379-383 (FR)
- Coutron, Laurent: Contentieux de l'UE - En attendant la Pologne, la Cour au secours de l'indépendance des juges portugais... (CJUE, gr. ch., 27 févr. 2018, aff. C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses), Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2019, n° 2, p. 459-463 (FR)
- Torres Pérez, Aida: From Portugal to Poland : the Court of Justice of the European Union as watchdog of judicial independence, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2020 p. 105-119 (EN)
- Krzywoń, Adam: La defensa y el desarrollo del principio de independencia judicial en la Unión Europea, Revista española de Derecho Constitucional 2020 nº 119 p. 85-117 (ES)
- Magaldi, Nuria: La construcción de un Poder Judicial europeo y las garantías de su independencia, Revista española de Derecho Constitucional 2022 nº 125 p. 127-157 (ES)
- Leloup, Mathieu: The Untapped Potential of the Systemic Criterion in the ECJ’s Case Law on Judicial Independence, German Law Journal 2023, Vol. 24, n° 6, p. 995-1010 (EN)
- Andriantsimbazovina, Joël: 68. Protection juridictionnelle effective - Qualité de juridiction - Indépendance des juges. CJUE, gr. ch., 27 févr. 2018, n° C-64/16, Associaçao Sindical dos Juizes Portugueses (ASJP), Les grands arrêts de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne. Droit constitutionnel et institutionnel de l'Union européenne (Dalloz, 2e édition) 2023, p. 1075-1082 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Supremo Tribunal Administrativo - Portugal
Subject-matter
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Levits
Advocate General
Saugmandsgaard Øe
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion